Jump to content

Talk:10 West Studios: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment (Redirect): Film, Michigan, +banner shell (Rater)
Bot removing the article class assessment
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk page of redirect}}
{{Talk page of redirect}}
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{WikiProject banner shell |1=
{{WikiProject Filmilmmaking=yes}}<!-- Formerly a<!-- Formerly assessed as Redirect-class -->ssessed as Redirect-class -->
{{WikiProject Film|class=Redirect|American=yes|Filmmaking=yes}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|class=Redirect|Detroit=yes}}
{{WikiProject Michigan|Detroit=yes}}<!-- Formerly assessed as Redirect-class -->
}}
}}
{{connected contributor|User1=009o9|U1-declared=yes}}
{{connected contributor|User1=009o9|U1-declared=yes}}

Revision as of 06:06, 14 May 2020

Connected contributor declaration redacted

A Connected contributor status was declared prematurely for 10 West Studios and affiliates, At this point in time I have no personal or financial connection with the subject. I've sat on several finished article for two months and decided to publish them freely rather than destroy the draft articles. I have gained advanced knowledge of the Film Industry in Michigan and The Michigan Film Incentive may continue to write WP:NOPAY in this genre009o9 (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Point of View

The lead reads like it was written by 10 West Studios. For example, the use of the word brainchild in the first sentence. Additionally, the entire article needs to be revised to conform to this standard, WP:NPOV. JanetWand (talk) 21:11, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please be more specific, 10 West Studios was the idea, concept and creation of Cronk and Tailford, I changed the word to "creation". Otherwise, I see the article as informative, if you have content to add to the article, please feel free to do so. 009o9 (talk) 22:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed for POV, made suggested changes and have had no response from JanetWand concerning POV concerns. No additional contace for 17 days now, assuming concerns have been addressed and consensus has been reached.009o9 (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article brought to compliance. JanetWand (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]