Talk:Rush (Rush album): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m moved Talk:Rush (Rush album) to Talk:Rush (album): per move request, undoing pre-emptive disambiguation; see talk page for details |
closing RM discussion, page moved |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{move|Rush (album)}} |
|||
{{talkheader}} |
{{talkheader}} |
||
{{album}} |
{{album}} |
||
__TOC__ |
|||
<div class="boilerplate" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:polltop --> |
|||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the {{{type|proposal}}}. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. '' |
|||
{{{result|The result of the debate was}}} '''PAGE MOVED''' per discussion below. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]<sup>([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]])</sup> 16:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Requested move == |
== Requested move == |
||
[[Rush (Rush album)]] → [[Rush (album)]] — Renamed as a preemptive disambiguation. While there may be several albums named ''Rush'', none are listed on Wikipedia, and those that exist may not merit a writeup under this title. Anyway, the debut album by the band Rush would likely be the most notable. [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 08:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC) |
[[Rush (Rush album)]] → [[Rush (album)]] — Renamed as a preemptive disambiguation. While there may be several albums named ''Rush'', none are listed on Wikipedia, and those that exist may not merit a writeup under this title. Anyway, the debut album by the band Rush would likely be the most notable. [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 08:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 25: | ||
*The Eric Clapton album of that title is a movie soundtrack called [[Rush_(soundtrack)]]. As the Rush debut album will likely be the most notable article with the title ''Rush (album)'', any other instances should use either the {{tl|otheruses4}} template (as is currently in use), or the {{tl|otheruses}} template (which links to a DAB page). |
*The Eric Clapton album of that title is a movie soundtrack called [[Rush_(soundtrack)]]. As the Rush debut album will likely be the most notable article with the title ''Rush (album)'', any other instances should use either the {{tl|otheruses4}} template (as is currently in use), or the {{tl|otheruses}} template (which links to a DAB page). |
||
*There is a current [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Naming_Conventions/Evidence#All_page_moves_made_to_remove_unneeded_disambiguation_were_supported_by_consensus|arbitration]] in effect on the subject of editors who insist on preemptive disambiguation. They are going against both precedent and the majority of editors. If you want to advocate for preemptive DAB, you might want to comment in that arbitration. — [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 08:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC) |
*There is a current [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Naming_Conventions/Evidence#All_page_moves_made_to_remove_unneeded_disambiguation_were_supported_by_consensus|arbitration]] in effect on the subject of editors who insist on preemptive disambiguation. They are going against both precedent and the majority of editors. If you want to advocate for preemptive DAB, you might want to comment in that arbitration. — [[User:Edgarde|edgarde]] 08:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <font color="red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</font> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div><!-- Template:pollbottom --> |
|||
== orphaned in-line references == |
== orphaned in-line references == |
||
Revision as of 16:38, 21 December 2006
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rush (Rush album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Albums Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Requested move
Rush (Rush album) → Rush (album) — Renamed as a preemptive disambiguation. While there may be several albums named Rush, none are listed on Wikipedia, and those that exist may not merit a writeup under this title. Anyway, the debut album by the band Rush would likely be the most notable. edgarde 08:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Survey
- Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Support — as per nom. If it's the only album by that title in Wikipedia, it's certainly more notable than any other albums named "Rush" that might exist. Use of the word "Rush" twice in the title appears needlessly redundant. Robotman1974 22:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support per nom and Robotman. --Serge 17:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - better title. -Part Deux 20:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support, no sense in having "Rush" twice in the title. PC78 10:25, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
- Add any additional comments:
Some background on preemptive disambiguations, which are in most cases a mistake.
- There are multiple precedents for undoing preemptive disambiguations — EP7, LP5, Manowar.
- The Eric Clapton album of that title is a movie soundtrack called Rush_(soundtrack). As the Rush debut album will likely be the most notable article with the title Rush (album), any other instances should use either the {{otheruses4}} template (as is currently in use), or the {{otheruses}} template (which links to a DAB page).
- There is a current arbitration in effect on the subject of editors who insist on preemptive disambiguation. They are going against both precedent and the majority of editors. If you want to advocate for preemptive DAB, you might want to comment in that arbitration. — edgarde 08:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
orphaned in-line references
Found these at the top of the article:
Neither seems worth including, but perhaps (for instance) an editor was going to seek a sub-page on Billboard or something, so I'm save both links here. — edgarde 09:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)