Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Poptodorova: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:24, 27 May 2020

Elena Poptodorova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Foreign Ministry service is almost entirely the same as the website [1]. Member of the National Parliament is almost the same as [2] Nadzik (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC) . I was thinking that I should just delete the copyrighted fragments, but that would leave less than half of the article. I know that Ambassador Poptodorova definitely belongs to Wikipedia, but the format of this article brakes our rules. Please discuss Nadzik (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. Nadzik (talk) 09:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep members of national parliaments are default notable, we are never going to delete this article. Feel free to edit out copyright violations and the like.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Copyright problems can be dealt with by editing, and even revision deleted out of the visible edit history if necessary — so they're not necessarily grounds to delete an article about an NPOL-passing politician, since the article can very easily just be rewritten. There are sometimes contexts where the best way to deal with a copyright violation can indeed be to delete it and then restart it from scratch — but a situation where removing the copyright problem erases half the article isn't one of those, because the other half of the article is still there. Bearcat (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a member of national parliament the subject is notable as a default Alexdlp10 (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Keep''' members of national parliaments are default notable, we are never going to delete this article. Feel free to edit out copyright violations and the like.[[User:Johnpacklambert|John Pack Lambert]] ([[User talk:Johnpacklambert|talk]]) 13:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Keep'''. Copyright problems can be dealt with by editing, and even [[WP:REVDEL|revision deleted]] out of the visible edit history if necessary — so they're not necessarily grounds to delete an article about an NPOL-passing politician, since the article can very easily just be rewritten. There are sometimes contexts where the best way to deal with a copyright violation can indeed be to delete it and then restart it from scratch — but a situation where removing the copyright problem erases ''half'' the article isn't one of those, because the ''other'' half of the article is ''still there''. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 22:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
+*'''Keep''' as a member of national parliament the subject is notable as a default [[User:Alexdlp10|Alexdlp10]] ([[User talk:Alexdlp10|talk]]) 09:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)