Judicial review in India: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by Script Connoisseur (talk) to last revision by ClueBot NG (TW) |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2019}} |
||
Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority: an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution. Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers: the power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between the countries. |
'''Judicial review''' is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority: an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution. Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers: the power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between the countries. |
||
In [[India]], a [[judicial review]] is a review of government decisions done by the [[Supreme Court of India]]. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions which violates the Basic features of Constitution. |
In [[India]], a [[judicial review]] is a review of government decisions done by the [[Supreme Court of India]]. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions which violates the Basic features of Constitution. |
||
Related articles for the judicial review |
Related articles for the judicial review |
Revision as of 08:53, 4 July 2020
Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions that are incompatible with a higher authority: an executive decision may be invalidated for being unlawful or a statute may be invalidated for violating the terms of a constitution. Judicial review is one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers: the power of the judiciary to supervise the legislative and executive branches when the latter exceed their authority. The doctrine varies between jurisdictions, so the procedure and scope of judicial review may differ between the countries. In India, a judicial review is a review of government decisions done by the Supreme Court of India. A court with authority for judicial review may invalidate laws acts and governmental actions which violates the Basic features of Constitution. Related articles for the judicial review For Supreme court Article 32(Right to Constitutional Remedy) and Article 136(Special leave to appeal by the Supreme Court). For High Court Article 226(Power of High Courts to issue certain writs.) and Article 227(Power of superintendence over all courts by the High Court)
- REDIRECT [[1]]
.
References
https://indiankanoon.org/docfragment/139734870/?formInput=judicial%20review
https://indiankanoon.org/doc/981147/