Jump to content

User talk:Majun e Baqi: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
siasat.com: Replying to Toddy1 (using reply-link)
Line 53: Line 53:


:Wikipedia is collaborative. Sometimes it may seem adversarial, when people ask you for proof - but the challenge is to improve the article where that is possible.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 16:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
:Wikipedia is collaborative. Sometimes it may seem adversarial, when people ask you for proof - but the challenge is to improve the article where that is possible.<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">--[[User:Toddy1| Toddy1]] [[User talk:Toddy1|(talk)]]</span> 16:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
::{{u|Toddy1}}, I have tried to establish its notability a bit, kindly have a look If you can improve more, lots of love[[User:Majun e Baqi|Majun e Baqi]] ([[User talk:Majun e Baqi#top|talk]]) 17:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:28, 16 July 2020


Solved the neutrality issues of article Baji Rao I

Please check the article, I have tried to solve the neutrality issues. Mahusha (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on respective pageMajun e Baqi (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia guild of copy editors

What is this Wikipedia guild of copy editors.... Mahusha (talk) 11:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests Majun e Baqi (talk) 11:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahusha: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Requests here you can ask experienced editor for copy editing, usually editors use this option before promotion either to featured article or good article, thanksMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Majun e Baqi

Thank you for creating Khwaja Hasan Sani Nizami.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

North8000, thanks lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 06:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify of Draft:Budget Cuts

Hi! I hope you are well. I see you have moved Budget Cuts to draftspace, but I wanted to clarify. This article was brought up at AfD shortly before the draftification, where lots of sources were present. Moving the article to draftspace isn't really suitable, as it feels that it's an attempt to circumvent the AfD which was withdrawn/keep. I've retained the article back into mainspace and added the sources, but thought I'd let you know what went on with the article. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Vilenski, I am fine, sorry for haste I was moving the undersourced article to the draft space and mistakenly moved it into draft space. the article was undersourced when I moved it to draft space . Hurrily not seeing the Afd notice. Lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 10:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski, Having no intention to skip deletion process. Majun e Baqi (talk) 10:30, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not an issue. I thought I'd let you know. Draftification is a good measure, but sometimes a quick WP:BEFORE search is all that's needed to fix the article and keep it live. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 10:59, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Lee Vilenski, Thanks for your trustMajun e Baqi (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

siasat.com

I see that you have been putting citations marked "siasat.com" into articles.

These are actually to a proper newspaper called The Siasat Daily (see [https://www.siasat.com/editorial-standards/ the paper's website), it is a good source. When you cite it, you need to help the reader to understand that it is a good source. Please could you amend your citations to that site, in the following ways:

  • Please change {{cite web | to either {{cite | or {{cite news |.
  • Please change website=siasat.com to work=[[The Siasat Daily]]
  • Please put the dates in normal format: e.g 4 September 2019.
  • If the article being cite has a "by line", you need to add the name of the author to the citation. For example, if the by line says "BY MOHAMMED HUSSAIN", then you need to add |first1=Mohammed |last1=Hussain. It there are several authors, you should list them all.

If you do this, it will improve the article, and give the reader a greater feeling of confidence that what he/she is reading is true.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there is something you do not understand, ask.
Wikipedia is collaborative. Sometimes it may seem adversarial, when people ask you for proof - but the challenge is to improve the article where that is possible.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:24, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Toddy1, I have tried to establish its notability a bit, kindly have a look If you can improve more, lots of loveMajun e Baqi (talk) 17:28, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]