Talk:Lead-based paint in the United States: Difference between revisions
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Will mention be added to this article of the October 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision? [[Special:Contributions/173.88.241.33|173.88.241.33]] ([[User talk:173.88.241.33|talk]]) 03:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC) |
Will mention be added to this article of the October 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision? [[Special:Contributions/173.88.241.33|173.88.241.33]] ([[User talk:173.88.241.33|talk]]) 03:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC) |
||
: Please provide some background on this :-) |
: Please provide some background on this :-) [[Special:Contributions/132.19.202.73|132.19.202.73]] ([[User talk:132.19.202.73|talk]]) 14:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Regulatory Standards in the US == |
== Regulatory Standards in the US == |
Revision as of 14:09, 3 August 2020
![]() | United States Unassessed | |||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lead-based paint in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020054703/http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/214039-another-paint-suit-brushed-away to http://legalnewsline.com/news/214039-another-paint-suit-brushed-away
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lead-based paint in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080921031631/http://www.nuisancelaw.com/court-decisions/rhode-island-supreme-court-2008 to http://www.nuisancelaw.com/court-decisions/rhode-island-supreme-court-2008
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121113200714/http://legalnewsline.com/news/214352-paint-industrys-appeal-of-contingent-fee-contract-will-be-heard-by-calif.-sc to http://www.legalnewsline.com/news/214352-paint-industrys-appeal-of-contingent-fee-contract-will-be-heard-by-calif.-sc
- Added archive https://archive.is/20081209055428/http://www.nuisancelaw.com/court-decisions/contingent-fee to http://www.nuisancelaw.com/court-decisions/contingent-fee
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision
Will mention be added to this article of the October 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 03:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please provide some background on this :-) 132.19.202.73 (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Regulatory Standards in the US
What I have found is the following:
1. United States Congress, Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act, October 1992;
2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Guidance on Residential Lead-Based Paint, Lead-Contaminated Dust and Lead-Contaminated Soil, July 1994;
3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Affairs, Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing, July 2012;
4. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Subcommittee E06.23, “Standards on Lead Hazards Associated with Buildings”, September 1998;
5. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Office of Health Compliance Assistance, 29 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 1926.62, Lead Exposure in Construction; “Interim Final Rule – Inspection and Compliance Procedures”, December 1993/ change 1, November 2015. Additional OSHA guidance can be found here: https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/LBPH-48.PDF
There are also some additional policies on lead-based paint in the US. Is there anything important missing? --132.25.0.211 (talk) 14:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)