User talk:119.74.169.63

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 10:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Jai Shri Ram. Casting aspersions and accusing other editors of ill-intentions -- without any evidence to back your statements up -- is a serious issue, and won't be tolerated. Everyone is welcome to comment on improving an article - no one is allowed to attack another editor. Thank you, —MelbourneStar☆^talk 10:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

@MelbourneStar:I agree with it as our job is to put forward facts based on available reliable sources. However as you can see certain articles has been written with tiny dopes of adulterated Opinion which violates WP:NPOV. We can tend to disagree on our approach but we must respect individuals. I am sorry to say that topics related to India has been in huge dispute offlate on being biased. I also believe if there is a dissent then there is a reason and it need to be identified. If nobody raises voice then slowly Wikipedia will become a cult and will lose it's impartial and unbiased articles. Look at articles like Delhi Riots where despite Tahir Hussain even after accepting his role as mastermind behind it we are ignoring it. Our article on Delhi Riots 2020 makes propagandists to talk more about Wikipedia being biased as if you read NDTV, TOI, NEW18, TimeNOW (leading reliable source) then it appears a farce. I might have personal affiliations with an ideology but if my article gets biased then I think I have no right to contribute on Wikipedia. We need to have that element of NPOV and avoid quoting sources who are communal unfortunately some authors quote sources who are well noted on all social platform as communal.

By the way just scroll above on same page where I wrote left-wing as a pun in response to someone who is disrespecting other contributors as more right wing contributor. He/She was not criticised and isn't that endorsing left-wing is the right way here.

Thanks again. Cheers!!!

Controversial topic area alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 — Newslinger talk 19:06, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

119.74.169.63 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 119.74.169.63. This is not a colocation so why this ban. I read and as per rules it is absolutely fine to contribute without any user id.119.74.169.63 (talk) 05:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This IP is not blocked, so you will need to turn off any VPN or proxy that you are using, clear your browser's cache, and possibly wait 24 hours to edit. You do not need to create an account, but doing so avoids issues like this. 331dot (talk) 08:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks. Seems our IT changes these things at background for some reasons. Luckily there aren't more than one contributors from same address else all edits will appear here.