User talk:Alicam

Welcome!

Hello, Alicam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

• In addition, I hope I've addressed the concerns you expressed at Talk:Auspice. You made good points that improve the usefulness of Auspicious, which I've converted to a disambiguation page with a Wiktionary link. Please check it out to see whether it works better now. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clear Networks Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clear Networks Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Alicam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Nick-D (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

The short version of the above is that you should not be editing any articles related to your employer. Nick-D (talk) 08:51, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for arranging for another editor to edit on your behalf to create an article on your boss, after you had been asked to adhere to WP:COI and told you needed to avoid this topic (per User talk:Nick-D#Martyn Iles).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick-D (talk) 08:28, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Alicam (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been more than transparent in explaining my noob status, in trying to understand the process, in being courteous in letting you know what I'm doing, hence the message to your talk page which any nefariously-minded person would never have disclosed... Who would "out" themselves like that if they knew they'd done wrong?? I have done all I can to be honest and reasonable. I don't mind some sort of punitive action, if that's what's done around here, but to put an indefinite ban on someone's very innocent mistake is very harsh. Further, I never saw in the WP:COI where it makes clear that approaching an independent party was wrong. Can you point that out, because in looking again, I still can't see it? I genuinely thought this WAS a legitimate way to ensure no COI was possible! Alicam (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been more than transparent in explaining my noob status, in trying to understand the process, in being courteous in letting you know what I'm doing, hence the message to your talk page which any nefariously-minded person would never have disclosed... Who would "out" themselves like that if they knew they'd done wrong?? I have done all I can to be honest and reasonable. I don't mind some sort of punitive action, if that's what's done around here, but to put an indefinite ban on someone's very innocent mistake is very harsh. Further, I never saw in the [[WP:COI]] where it makes clear that approaching an independent party was wrong. Can you point that out, because in looking again, I still can't see it? I genuinely thought this WAS a legitimate way to ensure no COI was possible! [[User:Alicam|Alicam]] ([[User talk:Alicam#top|talk]]) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been more than transparent in explaining my noob status, in trying to understand the process, in being courteous in letting you know what I'm doing, hence the message to your talk page which any nefariously-minded person would never have disclosed... Who would "out" themselves like that if they knew they'd done wrong?? I have done all I can to be honest and reasonable. I don't mind some sort of punitive action, if that's what's done around here, but to put an indefinite ban on someone's very innocent mistake is very harsh. Further, I never saw in the [[WP:COI]] where it makes clear that approaching an independent party was wrong. Can you point that out, because in looking again, I still can't see it? I genuinely thought this WAS a legitimate way to ensure no COI was possible! [[User:Alicam|Alicam]] ([[User talk:Alicam#top|talk]]) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been more than transparent in explaining my noob status, in trying to understand the process, in being courteous in letting you know what I'm doing, hence the message to your talk page which any nefariously-minded person would never have disclosed... Who would "out" themselves like that if they knew they'd done wrong?? I have done all I can to be honest and reasonable. I don't mind some sort of punitive action, if that's what's done around here, but to put an indefinite ban on someone's very innocent mistake is very harsh. Further, I never saw in the [[WP:COI]] where it makes clear that approaching an independent party was wrong. Can you point that out, because in looking again, I still can't see it? I genuinely thought this WAS a legitimate way to ensure no COI was possible! [[User:Alicam|Alicam]] ([[User talk:Alicam#top|talk]]) 06:07, 20 August 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}