User talk:Mariolovr

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely for persistent tendentious and disruptive editing. See [1]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 15:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC).

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mariolovr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, I definitely was not expecting this. First, I appreciate your position, but I feel like it needs reconsideration. As I said during the ANI, I am very sorry. My disruptive behavior was definitely a big mistake, and resulted from a severe misunderstanding of the rules, but I won't do it again. In fact, I had already stopped that behavior even before the ANI, and I had been trying to do more constructive things before this block (like starting an RfC to get consensus and fighting vandalism. All I ask is that I can get a second chance. Mariolovr (talk) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi, I definitely was not expecting this. First, I appreciate your position, but I feel like it needs reconsideration. As I said during the ANI, I am very sorry. My disruptive behavior was definitely a big mistake, and resulted from a severe misunderstanding of the rules, but I won't do it again. In fact, I had already stopped that behavior even before the ANI, and I had been trying to do more constructive things before this block (like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Horse_slaughter#RfC:_Removing_every_image_from_horse_slaughter_article starting an RfC to get consensus] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sukhoi_Superjet_100&oldid=prev&diff=978974569 fighting vandalism]. All I ask is that I can get a second chance. [[User:Mariolovr|Mariolovr]] ([[User talk:Mariolovr#top|talk]]) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I definitely was not expecting this. First, I appreciate your position, but I feel like it needs reconsideration. As I said during the ANI, I am very sorry. My disruptive behavior was definitely a big mistake, and resulted from a severe misunderstanding of the rules, but I won't do it again. In fact, I had already stopped that behavior even before the ANI, and I had been trying to do more constructive things before this block (like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Horse_slaughter#RfC:_Removing_every_image_from_horse_slaughter_article starting an RfC to get consensus] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sukhoi_Superjet_100&oldid=prev&diff=978974569 fighting vandalism]. All I ask is that I can get a second chance. [[User:Mariolovr|Mariolovr]] ([[User talk:Mariolovr#top|talk]]) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi, I definitely was not expecting this. First, I appreciate your position, but I feel like it needs reconsideration. As I said during the ANI, I am very sorry. My disruptive behavior was definitely a big mistake, and resulted from a severe misunderstanding of the rules, but I won't do it again. In fact, I had already stopped that behavior even before the ANI, and I had been trying to do more constructive things before this block (like [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Horse_slaughter#RfC:_Removing_every_image_from_horse_slaughter_article starting an RfC to get consensus] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sukhoi_Superjet_100&oldid=prev&diff=978974569 fighting vandalism]. All I ask is that I can get a second chance. [[User:Mariolovr|Mariolovr]] ([[User talk:Mariolovr#top|talk]]) 16:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}