Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Nikhil Jindal 22: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:35, 28 September 2020

Draft:Nikhil Jindal 22

Clear autobiography. I am not sure if it meets G11 (if it does then please speedily delete the draft). Train of Knowledge (Talk) 05:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ignore. MfD is not for funnelling worthless useless drafts. G13 was made for this stuff. Only come to MfD over a draft if it violations something at WP:NOT, or is being tendentiously resubmitted. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Doesn't need deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep No valid reason to delete that I can see. Does not look likely to be approved as an article, not indication of notability. Still one might be added. Not even close to G11, by the way. "Autobiography" is not a reason for deletion, neither in draft space nor in article space. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 21:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * '''ignore'''.  MfD is not for funnelling worthless useless drafts. G13 was made for this stuff.  Only come to MfD over a draft if it violations something at [[WP:NOT]], or is being tendentiously resubmitted. —[[User:SmokeyJoe|SmokeyJoe]] ([[User talk:SmokeyJoe|talk]]) 22:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Weak Keep''' - Doesn't need deleting.  [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 17:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
+*'''keep''' No valid reason to delete that I can see. Does not look likely to be approved as an article, not indication of notability. Still one might be added. Not even close to G11, by the way. "Autobiography" is not a reason for deletion, neither in draft space nor in article space. [[User:DESiegel|DES]] [[User talk:DESiegel|<sup>(talk)</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/DESiegel|<sub>DESiegel Contribs</sub>]] 21:35, 28 September 2020 (UTC)