Space fountain: Difference between revisions
Brianjychan (talk | contribs) clarify description: support of vacuum tubes |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
A '''space fountain''' is a proposed form of an extremely tall tower extending into space. As known materials cannot support a static tower with this height, a space fountain has to be an [[active structure]]: A stream of pellets is accelerated upwards at a ground station. At the top it is deflected downwards. The necessary force for this deflection supports the station at the top and payloads going up the structure.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/articles/orbital-railroads-beanstalks-and-space-fountains/ |title=Orbital Railroads: Beanstalks and Space Fountains|first=Paul |last=Lucas |work=Strange Horizons |date=14 July 2003|accessdate=14 December 2018}}</ref> Spacecraft could launch from the top without having to deal with the atmosphere. This could reduce the cost of placing payloads into orbit. As downside the tower will collapse if the containment systems fail and the stream is broken. This risk could be reduced by several redundant streams.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/03/stairways-to-heaven/376348/|title=Stairways to Heaven|first=Gregory|last=Feely|author-link=Gregory Feeley|work=The Atlantic|date=March 1992|accessdate=14 December 2018}}</ref> |
A '''space fountain''' is a proposed form of an extremely tall tower extending into space. As known materials cannot support a static tower with this height, a space fountain has to be an [[active structure]]: A stream of pellets is accelerated upwards at a ground station. At the top it is deflected downwards. The necessary force for this deflection supports the station at the top and payloads going up the structure.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://strangehorizons.com/non-fiction/articles/orbital-railroads-beanstalks-and-space-fountains/ |title=Orbital Railroads: Beanstalks and Space Fountains|first=Paul |last=Lucas |work=Strange Horizons |date=14 July 2003|accessdate=14 December 2018}}</ref> Spacecraft could launch from the top without having to deal with the atmosphere. This could reduce the cost of placing payloads into orbit. As downside the tower will collapse if the containment systems fail and the stream is broken. This risk could be reduced by several redundant streams.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/03/stairways-to-heaven/376348/|title=Stairways to Heaven|first=Gregory|last=Feely|author-link=Gregory Feeley|work=The Atlantic|date=March 1992|accessdate=14 December 2018}}</ref> |
||
The lower part of |
The lower part of a pellet stream has to be in a vacuum tube to avoid excessive drag in the atmosphere. Similar to the top station, this tube can be supported by its own system of transferring momentum from a space-bound stream to a surface-bound stream. If the tube itself also accelerates the station-supporting stream, it would have to transfer additional momentum to an earth-bound stream in order to keep itself supported. The tube-supporting streams could also be designed to integrate with the station-supporting streams. <ref name="Forward">{{Citation|last=Forward|first=Robert L. |author-link=Robert L. Forward|year=1995|chapter=Beanstalks|title=Indistinguishable From Magic|page=79|isbn=0-671-87686-4}}</ref> |
||
Unlike a [[space elevator]] this concept does not need extremely strong materials anywhere and unlike space elevators and [[orbital ring]]s it does not need a {{convert|40,000|km|mi|adj=on}} long structure.<ref name="Forward" /> One downside of the space fountain is that it does not provide orbital speed on its own; payloads released from the top have zero velocity relative to the ground. |
Unlike a [[space elevator]] this concept does not need extremely strong materials anywhere and unlike space elevators and [[orbital ring]]s it does not need a {{convert|40,000|km|mi|adj=on}} long structure.<ref name="Forward" /> One downside of the space fountain is that it does not provide orbital speed on its own; payloads released from the top have zero velocity relative to the ground. |
||
Revision as of 01:21, 16 October 2020
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2018) |
A space fountain is a proposed form of an extremely tall tower extending into space. As known materials cannot support a static tower with this height, a space fountain has to be an active structure: A stream of pellets is accelerated upwards at a ground station. At the top it is deflected downwards. The necessary force for this deflection supports the station at the top and payloads going up the structure.[1] Spacecraft could launch from the top without having to deal with the atmosphere. This could reduce the cost of placing payloads into orbit. As downside the tower will collapse if the containment systems fail and the stream is broken. This risk could be reduced by several redundant streams.[2]
The lower part of a pellet stream has to be in a vacuum tube to avoid excessive drag in the atmosphere. Similar to the top station, this tube can be supported by its own system of transferring momentum from a space-bound stream to a surface-bound stream. If the tube itself also accelerates the station-supporting stream, it would have to transfer additional momentum to an earth-bound stream in order to keep itself supported. The tube-supporting streams could also be designed to integrate with the station-supporting streams. [3]
Unlike a space elevator this concept does not need extremely strong materials anywhere and unlike space elevators and orbital rings it does not need a 40,000-kilometre (25,000 mi) long structure.[3] One downside of the space fountain is that it does not provide orbital speed on its own; payloads released from the top have zero velocity relative to the ground.
See also
- Launch loop
- Mass driver
- Megascale engineering
- Non-rocket spacelaunch
- Orbital ring
- Space elevator
- Space gun
References
- ^ Lucas, Paul (14 July 2003). "Orbital Railroads: Beanstalks and Space Fountains". Strange Horizons. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
- ^ Feely, Gregory (March 1992). "Stairways to Heaven". The Atlantic. Retrieved 14 December 2018.
- ^ a b Forward, Robert L. (1995), "Beanstalks", Indistinguishable From Magic, p. 79, ISBN 0-671-87686-4
 | This engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article about futures studies is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |