Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matis Weinberg: Difference between revisions
Dmoore5556 (talk | contribs) →Matis Weinberg: reply |
Meir Simchah (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* Delete – unsourced BLP. [[User:Dmoore5556|Dmoore5556]] ([[User talk:Dmoore5556|talk]]) 06:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
* Delete – unsourced BLP. [[User:Dmoore5556|Dmoore5556]] ([[User talk:Dmoore5556|talk]]) 06:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
||
* Delete - unsourced BLP [[User:Meir Simchah|Meir Simchah]] ([[User talk:Meir Simchah|talk]]) 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:56, 3 November 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Matis Weinberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was PROD'd, but edits of another editor indicate they do want content kept. The only coverage of this person is unproven past allegations (see history) of misconduct, that didn't result in any conviction. There are no sources to indicate notability. There are no sources outside the allegations. I didn't removed unsourced claims, as that would empty the article. Writing some books, of unknown success, isn't notable. Being in a famous family isn't notable, even if the claim was sourced. One reason for not leaving the PROD, is I don't want this easily brought back. The article has only two possible versions: an unsourced promotional puff piece, or a poorly sourced scandal article. --Rob (talk) 02:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I expressed serious concerns about this article at WP:BLPN in April, 2014, suggesting deletion as a possibility. My concerns remain. We cannot have an unreferenced BLP, but the only significant coverage of this person in reliable sources has to do with unproven allegations of sexual impropriety, forcefully denies by the subject. This material that should not be in a BLP. I agree with Rob. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a sourceless, content-free article that, despite the subject's many magnum opera, bothers not list any of them. Seligne (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough sources are available to write a neutral article. Prior versions of the article placed undue weight on unverified scandals. Jehochman Talk 04:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete – unsourced BLP. Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - unsourced BLP Meir Simchah (talk) 07:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)