User talk:Tubbyty

This is also the definition used in many books such as Racial and Ethical Relations (Feagin and Feagin) but they also discuss geographical influences

March 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ann Coulter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 04:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Ok. It seems I have been blocked for adding references- WITH CITATIONS. This must be fixed immediately, or a I will never contribute to wikipedia again.

No, that is incorrect. That's not why you were blocked. You have been blocked for edit warring and editing against the consensus established on the article talk page. If you want to file an unblock request, follow the instructions in the block notice. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 03:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries like this while edit-warring lead to blocks [1], especially after a recent RfC on the subject. Acroterion (talk) 03:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Tubbyty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Everything I inserted was backed up by a reference. Everything I deleted had no reference. Is Wikipedia now censoring unfavorable facts, even if accompanied by a reference?