Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dare Jennings: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:58, 22 November 2020

Dare Jennings

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. The company he created possibly scrapes by the notability guidelines but this BLP is woefully inadequately supported by sources which seem to be an interview , an article about the company selling out and a commentary on seling the business. Searches reveal nothing. Fails WP:GNG Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 23:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mambo Graphics. An obvious alternative to deletion that must be considered before deletion. Deus et lex (talk) 00:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An interview in RS/IS is SIGCOV for notability in my book.— Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 17:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment any interview is rarely satisfactory for establishing notability as it is in the subject's own words. I haven't a clue what "RS/IS" is but it doesn't seem to be one of the refs quoted and my searches fail to find anything of that name. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, if an WP:RS/WP:IS features an interview of a subject, that is WP:SIGCOV for establishing notability. Interviews are primary with respect to establishing specific facts. But SIGCOV is easily established with interviews. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 14:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as suggested to Mambo Graphics. Whenever I see a two-sentence BLP and coverage so shallow that a fully-flesh biography is not possible, its time to delete or redirect. Bearian (talk) 21:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Out of three sources, two are interviews which are primary and do not count towards establishing notability. I am not opposed to redirect either.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews in RS/IS do count as SIGCOV for establishing notability. They just are not good sources of factual information. (If an RS/IS considered someone important enough to interview them, that's not trivial.) — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 14:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Redirect''' as suggested to [[Mambo Graphics]]. Whenever I see a two-sentence BLP and coverage so shallow that a fully-flesh biography is not possible, its time to delete or redirect. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 21:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' Out of three sources, two are interviews which are primary and do not count towards establishing notability. I am not opposed to redirect either.[[User:Faizal batliwala|Faizal batliwala]] ([[User talk:Faizal batliwala|talk]]) 14:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
-:Interviews in RS/IS do count as SIGCOV for establishing notability. They just are not good sources of factual information. — '''[[User:Ad Meliora|Ad Meliora]]''' [[User talk:Ad Meliora|<sup>Talk</sup>]]∕[[Special:Contributions/Ad Meliora|<sub>Contribs</sub>]] 14:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
+:Interviews in RS/IS do count as SIGCOV for establishing notability. They just are not good sources of factual information. (If an RS/IS considered someone important enough to interview them, that's not trivial.) — '''[[User:Ad Meliora|Ad Meliora]]''' [[User talk:Ad Meliora|<sup>Talk</sup>]]∕[[Special:Contributions/Ad Meliora|<sub>Contribs</sub>]] 14:47, 22 November 2020 (UTC)