User talk:Ranadhira

A banner for you!

	A banner for you!
	Thank you for creating the Battle of Gangwana article. Researching it was an incredibly educational and enlightening experience. Have a Jodhpur flag for your troubles. SamHolt6 05:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Prithviraj Chauhan page

Hello Randhira I observe recently u tried to made edit on Prithviraj chauhan page about his Rajput identity or something like this where u were yet to gave a scholary source About that Particular identity well i advice u should edit that page now From a scholary source of Jadunath sarkar a renowned historian about Rajput identity which clearly state that it emerge during ghurid invasion In 12th century on pg 32 in first paragraph also there are more proofs in sarkar book that is A history of jaipur about kacchawa when they migrate to Rajpuatana in 12th century,If u want to clear it u can please edit that page along with many pages like Chauhan dynasty and Rajputana one here is the book its scholary and ur change will be accepted most probably,I will advice u to please wrote it clearly about his identity with scholary book i am giving the link Please Establish it clearly about Prithviraj instead of anarchronism whicb isnt the case atleast in 12th century Because sarkar clearly mention Rajput as a race emerge in social structure of india During Ghurid raids He also briefly wrote about the Dynasty i think as veteran editor u should clearly mention this because it is more excepted version even in basic book and with sarkar refrenece there is hardly one doubt a bit.If it helps u its my pleasure. Here is the ref to the scholary book of Renowned historian Jadunath Sarkar about Prithviraj identity

Jadunath Sarkar (1960). Military History of India. Orient Longmans.

Pg no 32 shihabuddin Ghori vs Prithviraj first Paragraph clearly states about Emeregence of Rajput as a race in social structure of india.You can directly search by directing pecuilar race in preivew of this book for ur satisfaction.

Also there is page about Rajasthan and Rajputana where it states that it was called rajputana after 18th century by british which is also wrong If exact time is unknown then it must be known as Rajputana from atleast 12th century when Kacchawa rajputs migrate there this is also in Sarkar diff book i.e A History of Jaipur,i will post it link too Kacchwa identity too as rajput became prominent in 12th century it also gave proof about Prithviraj identity with more nuance,Please edit this 2 changes in these 3 pages these are rather misguiding. Here's the link again to that page.

Jadunath Sarkar (1994). A History of Jaipur: C. 1503-1938. Orient Blackswan. ISBN 978-81-250-0333-5.

Pg.22 about kacchwa when they migrates ti rajputaana in 12th century so atleast it is known as rajputana from 12th century it also provide more prooof about Rajput identity which emerge in 12th century of Prithviraj correct these 3 pages i provide a aceadmic work for u.Thank u please make this 4 changes.Thanks randhira. Dk Lillee 1949 (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hello there is a guy who left message on your talk page about 3 issues which u were trying to edit about Prithviraj chauhan identity,Rajputana,And Rajsthan the user did provide scholary sources for same u can make edits on that particular pages and go with established versions.Caliphates 727 (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Another Notification

As i informed u earlier u should look at page of Rajputana,Rajasthan and Prithviraj chauhan identity as given secondary sources for the same ,In rajputana it is given that it was coined by british which is total false Book ref is also given And Nearly all scholars admitt that Rajput identity did exist during Prithviraja-III reign which is also missing Sarkar book clearly mention it emereg during ghurid invasion i think as senior editor u should look into the same and change as it is more accepted version universally.Thanks Caliphates 727 (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Khanua page

Hello again I observe battle of khanua page in build up section it is given that Rana sanga call Babur to invade delhi and assist him But prominent historian GN sharma dismiss this theory badly his sources are used to wrote Govt books of india,anyway i am prvoviding the book link if u cant Remove the old version please add Sharma's view too.

https://archive.org/details/in.gov.ignca.10571/page/n49/mode/2up

Pg. 22 of this book mewar and mughal emperors u should add this along wirh other edits i suggest u likes ones of Prithviraja idenitity,Rajputana page and rajasthan one where aceadmic sources are provided please do this edits.Thanks. Caliphates 727 (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello

There are several messages on your talk page from diff users kindly look at them with the sources provided If not clean ur talk page.Thanks . Aspotate Prophet 527 (talk) 10:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

About Battle of khanua

Hello Randhira i notice u made some changes again to Khanua page About army strength of Rajputs .U see the muslim supported Sanga army was actually no more than 5% of the army And most of them were Rajputs i add that data to make that clear that afghan allies were in small number it was rajput and mughal battle Supported by some afghans with small army for their own sake restor that refrence it was evene verified by administraitor.The String 20 (talk) 11:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

It is written that a contingent of Afghans supported them. Also according to Satish Chandra, there were 10,000 Afghans and 12,000 muslim Rajputs under Hasan Khan. So that is more than 5%. Ranadhira (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

U know what the exact number of Rajput army is unknown some even said about 2 lakh rajputs gathered and Afghan supported him because they have no option left Anyway even from any way Over 75% about 85% of the army was of Rajputs and Gn sharma said there were no more than 10,000 muslim allies in battle thast why added that respective point.Anyway correct in notes as Rajput army the battle was literally between Rajput and Mughals for supermacy of North india.The String 20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Contacted by sockpuppet

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the accounts that have been messaging you recently (Paul bearer2013, Ministry of Darkness98, Dk Lillee 1949, Caliphates 727, Aspotate Prophet 527 and The String 20) are confirmed sockpuppets of User:Showbiz826, who had been blocked for edit warring and block evasion. Due to various page protections and IP blocks, Showbiz826 is unable to make edits themselves on many articles. Instead, they have made several sockpuppets which they use to try to pester other users into implementing their desired edits. It is therefore likely that they will contact you again in the guise of a new account. I'll leave it up to you how you decide to deal with this, though I personally believe it is best to just ignore such messages. I suspect that you were already aware that something like this was going on, but in any case, I hope you find this message useful.
Alivardi (talk) 18:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. Ranadhira (talk) 18:31, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

>confirmed sockpuppets

One question hwo editors or even administers confirm that this account is a alternate or sockpuppet of this account Alivardi (talk · contribs) Sungpeshwe9 (talk) 10:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you for your contribution and improving rajput battle pages may maa bhavani bless you

Jai rajputana 🚩 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sungpeshwe9 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 4 December 2020 (UTC)