Talk:Magnet fishing: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Possible 'Notable finds' section: new section |
reassessments requested archeology-environment WPs |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I didn't add this section to my most recent edit because I fear it could become [[WP:LISTCRUFT]] unless it's very well-defined, but I feel like [https://www.foxnews.com/us/north-carolina-fisherman-reels-in-backpack-with-emaciated-pit-bull-stuffed-inside-police-say this article] would be useful if a 'Notable finds' section is ever added to this article (or for a section about solved crimes). <b>[[User:TheTechnician27|<span style="color: #00a9ff"><i>TheTechnician27</i></span>]]</b> [[User talk:TheTechnician27|<span style="color: blue">(Talk page)</span>]] 01:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) |
I didn't add this section to my most recent edit because I fear it could become [[WP:LISTCRUFT]] unless it's very well-defined, but I feel like [https://www.foxnews.com/us/north-carolina-fisherman-reels-in-backpack-with-emaciated-pit-bull-stuffed-inside-police-say this article] would be useful if a 'Notable finds' section is ever added to this article (or for a section about solved crimes). <b>[[User:TheTechnician27|<span style="color: #00a9ff"><i>TheTechnician27</i></span>]]</b> [[User talk:TheTechnician27|<span style="color: blue">(Talk page)</span>]] 01:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Project Reassessments Referred == |
|||
High importance rating for both WikiProjects Archeology and Environment are probably erroneous to some degree (despite the subjective nature of ratings), simple based on their posted rating scales. I have referred this to the projects assessment requests. Low would most likely be applicable. Please be sure to refer assessments needed of new articles to the projects themselves. |
|||
Leaving the assessment links below so one can follow if the assessment process is of interest. |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Archaeology/Assessment]] |
|||
* [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Environment/Assessment]] |
|||
[[User:OfficerManatee|OfficerManatee]] ([[User talk:OfficerManatee|talk]]) 07:33, 30 December 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:33, 30 December 2020
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Archaeology C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. | Environment C‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Magnet fishing be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
UK Magnet Fishing Forum 22:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Possible 'Notable finds' section
I didn't add this section to my most recent edit because I fear it could become WP:LISTCRUFT unless it's very well-defined, but I feel like this article would be useful if a 'Notable finds' section is ever added to this article (or for a section about solved crimes). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 01:38, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Project Reassessments Referred
High importance rating for both WikiProjects Archeology and Environment are probably erroneous to some degree (despite the subjective nature of ratings), simple based on their posted rating scales. I have referred this to the projects assessment requests. Low would most likely be applicable. Please be sure to refer assessments needed of new articles to the projects themselves.
Leaving the assessment links below so one can follow if the assessment process is of interest.