User contributions for 68.48.241.158
Appearance
For 68.48.241.158 talk block log logs global block log filter log
26 February 2016
- 14:0714:07, 26 February 2016 diff hist +275 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 13:5513:55, 26 February 2016 diff hist +119 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 13:5313:53, 26 February 2016 diff hist +702 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 02:5802:58, 26 February 2016 diff hist +192 User talk:Oshwah →learning words is fun
- 02:4502:45, 26 February 2016 diff hist +158 User talk:Oshwah →learning words is fun: new section
- 02:4302:43, 26 February 2016 diff hist +129 User talk:ScrapIronIV →neumann
- 02:4202:42, 26 February 2016 diff hist −321 User talk:ScrapIronIV →Talkback
- 02:4102:41, 26 February 2016 diff hist +248 User talk:ScrapIronIV →Talkback
- 02:2702:27, 26 February 2016 diff hist +699 User talk:ScrapIronIV →neumann: new section
- 02:0202:02, 26 February 2016 diff hist +508 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
25 February 2016
- 21:3021:30, 25 February 2016 diff hist +972 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 19:5219:52, 25 February 2016 diff hist +1,350 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 02:1802:18, 25 February 2016 diff hist +388 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 00:5200:52, 25 February 2016 diff hist +636 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
24 February 2016
- 23:5623:56, 24 February 2016 diff hist +358 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 23:5123:51, 24 February 2016 diff hist +446 User talk:Sundayclose →Untitled
- 23:4323:43, 24 February 2016 diff hist −1 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..
- 23:3923:39, 24 February 2016 diff hist +1,062 Talk:George Harrison →small addition to INTRO regarding Harrison's legacy regarding high quality of his small Beatles' output..: new section
- 23:0523:05, 24 February 2016 diff hist +355 User talk:Sundayclose No edit summary
- 22:4122:41, 24 February 2016 diff hist +667 George Harrison small number/high quality...important and well known aspect of Harrison's Beatles' legacy, worth noting...McCartney quote in article proper on Harrison's later songs being as good if not better than Lennon and McCartney's..
- 21:2921:29, 24 February 2016 diff hist +324 George Harrison this is very often noted about his contributions: small number/high quality...Rolling Stone Magazine ranks two in top ten of all Beatles songs, which is common..
- 03:3903:39, 24 February 2016 diff hist 0 John von Neumann reworded
- 03:3103:31, 24 February 2016 diff hist +542 John von Neumann there's a section about this in article proper...has become an important pop aspect of the subject..figure worth quick mention in intro..
- 02:1502:15, 24 February 2016 diff hist −109 Cantor's diagonal argument deleted major awkwardness
22 February 2016
- 22:4322:43, 22 February 2016 diff hist −1 History of longitude No edit summary
- 22:4222:42, 22 February 2016 diff hist −10 History of longitude No edit summary
- 22:3522:35, 22 February 2016 diff hist +19 History of longitude No edit summary
- 22:3222:32, 22 February 2016 diff hist +222 History of longitude No edit summary
20 February 2016
- 20:0420:04, 20 February 2016 diff hist −7 Sergeant Reckless less 'editorialized'...still think good to mention she was decorated or considered a hero or something in first sentence as why she's of note..
- 19:4519:45, 20 February 2016 diff hist +184 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
- 19:2819:28, 20 February 2016 diff hist +345 Sergeant Reckless Undid revision 705897121 by Montanabw (talk)
17 February 2016
- 03:2103:21, 17 February 2016 diff hist +7 Purple Heart No edit summary
16 February 2016
- 23:2723:27, 16 February 2016 diff hist −1 Principia Mathematica No edit summary
- 22:5322:53, 16 February 2016 diff hist −779 Battle for Outpost Vegas section was overly broad and unfocused for this article...contained minutia better suited for Reckless' own wikipedia article....
- 18:0218:02, 16 February 2016 diff hist +222 Purple Heart figure of enough interest to warrant a couple sentences..
- 17:4417:44, 16 February 2016 diff hist +68 Purple Heart No edit summary
- 15:4715:47, 16 February 2016 diff hist +2 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
- 15:4615:46, 16 February 2016 diff hist +329 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
- 15:2215:22, 16 February 2016 diff hist +17 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
- 15:2015:20, 16 February 2016 diff hist 0 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
- 15:1915:19, 16 February 2016 diff hist +4 Sergeant Reckless No edit summary
15 February 2016
- 23:5623:56, 15 February 2016 diff hist 0 Principia Mathematica No edit summary
- 23:5523:55, 15 February 2016 diff hist +166 Principia Mathematica nod to PMs status as a curiosity piece among learned circles...
- 23:1123:11, 15 February 2016 diff hist +333 Metamathematics article proper very technical...figure intro could at least have some nontechnical though correct info...
- 22:4922:49, 15 February 2016 diff hist −265 Metamathematics deleted a borderline nonsensical attempt to get WAY too technical in the introduction..
- 22:1522:15, 15 February 2016 diff hist +240 Richard's paradox historical importance of paradox in metamathematics..
- 17:0917:09, 15 February 2016 diff hist +3 Gödel's incompleteness theorems His results were published in 1931 but announced at a conference in 1930 (as article correctly relates)...likely proven 1929-1930..
14 February 2016
- 18:5618:56, 14 February 2016 diff hist −49 Ludwig Wittgenstein Erroneous statement about aim of Tractatus..unambiguously contradicted by Wittgenstein quote at end of same paragraph.. good paragraph otherwise..
13 February 2016
- 18:0318:03, 13 February 2016 diff hist +426 Ontological argument Provided factual context, makes intro read better, nothing in edit asserts an opinion about the topic..summarizes info in article proper Undid revision 704798280 by Oshwah (talk)
- 17:4417:44, 13 February 2016 diff hist +426 Ontological argument No edit summary