User contributions for JavierNF96
Appearance
A user with 88 edits. Account created on 8 September 2017.
28 October 2017
- 18:2018:20, 28 October 2017 diff hist +1 User talk:JavierNF96 No edit summary
- 18:1918:19, 28 October 2017 diff hist +211 User talk:JavierNF96 No edit summary
- 15:1815:18, 28 October 2017 diff hist −6 m Spanish Empire Look in the article itself the section of the "Spanish Habsburgs" and you will see that the map also says that all the Patagonia was Spanish territory under the reign of these. And dont be insistent, I will not participate in the absurd discussion. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:1614:16, 28 October 2017 diff hist −6 Spanish Empire No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 13:4713:47, 28 October 2017 diff hist −6 Spanish Empire No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:2611:26, 28 October 2017 diff hist −6 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 October 2017
- 07:0707:07, 20 October 2017 diff hist −6 m Spanish Empire All Patagonia was in the spanish empire. I will not enter into the absurd discussion of the chat, just study a little history of Spain and stop being so dictator with the article. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
19 October 2017
- 20:1420:14, 19 October 2017 diff hist −13 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 19:4919:49, 19 October 2017 diff hist +7 m Spanish Empire All Patagonia was a territory controlled by the Spanish Empire in 1808 during the Viceroyalty of the "Rio de la Plata" It's unbelievable that the moderators (who supposedly should know history) eliminate it as if it had apparently been nobody's. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:3614:36, 19 October 2017 diff hist −8 m Spanish Empire This map is more complete. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
12 October 2017
- 16:2016:20, 12 October 2017 diff hist −836 Voyages of Christopher Columbus runes found in North America (eg Kensington runes or Oklahoma runes) were supposedly made by populations descended from the Scandinavians. [19] [20] [21] Runologists do not accept these findings as evidence of the colonization of Scandinavia in America, Tag: Visual edit
- 16:1416:14, 12 October 2017 diff hist 0 m Voyages of Christopher Columbus JavierNF96 moved page Voyages of Christopher Columbus to Discovery of America: Voyages of Christopher Columbus over redirect
- 16:1316:13, 12 October 2017 diff hist −836 Voyages of Christopher Columbus Viking didnt discover America. Vinland map was falsification. https://web.archive.org/web/20090323233700/http://www.el-esceptico.org/ver.php?idarticulo=155 Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 15:1415:14, 12 October 2017 diff hist −659 m Christopher Columbus No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 15:0915:09, 12 October 2017 diff hist −102 m Voyages of Christopher Columbus No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 15:0515:05, 12 October 2017 diff hist −850 Leif Erikson https://web.archive.org/web/20090323233700/http://www.el-esceptico.org/ver.php?idarticulo=155 Tag: Visual edit
- 15:0215:02, 12 October 2017 diff hist −291 m History of the Americas https://web.archive.org/web/20090323233700/http://www.el-esceptico.org/ver.php?idarticulo=155 McCartney, A.P. & D.J. Mack (1973) “Iron Utilization by Thule Eskimos of Central Canada”; Americ Tag: Visual edit
- 14:5914:59, 12 October 2017 diff hist 0 m Talk:Voyages of Christopher Columbus JavierNF96 moved page Talk:Voyages of Christopher Columbus to Talk:Discovery of America: Voyages of Christopher Columbus: The Vikings did not discover America, Vinland's map is according to British studies a forgery: McCartney, A.P. & D.J. Mac...
- 14:5914:59, 12 October 2017 diff hist 0 m Voyages of Christopher Columbus JavierNF96 moved page Voyages of Christopher Columbus to Discovery of America: Voyages of Christopher Columbus: The Vikings did not discover America, Vinland's map is according to British studies a forgery: McCartney, A.P. & D.J. Mack (1973)...
- 11:1311:13, 12 October 2017 diff hist −707 Voyages of Christopher Columbus it can not be said that the Vikings arrived earlier to America because the sources put on show that it was a possibility, but never a confirmed fact. Therefore, it was officially Columbus who discovered america Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:0211:02, 12 October 2017 diff hist +18 m Voyages of Christopher Columbus No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 10:5910:59, 12 October 2017 diff hist +22 Voyages of Christopher Columbus No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
6 October 2017
- 08:3208:32, 6 October 2017 diff hist +22 m Conquistador No edit summary
- 08:2708:27, 6 October 2017 diff hist +71 m Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 08:1708:17, 6 October 2017 diff hist 0 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
5 October 2017
- 18:3818:38, 5 October 2017 diff hist −620 m Spanish Empire Added an image that shows the total expansion of the Empire, the previous one is missing territories. Tag: Visual edit
- 17:3817:38, 5 October 2017 diff hist 0 Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 17:3717:37, 5 October 2017 diff hist +47 Conquistador You need to add the exploration of Asia. And as I said before, it is incredible that the article does not contain the Spanish exploration of South America and Central America. It is also necessary to add the exploration of Asia. Please, add it soon. Tag: Visual edit
- 17:3717:37, 5 October 2017 diff hist +50 Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 17:3617:36, 5 October 2017 diff hist −134 m Conquistador You need to add the spanish exploration of Asia. And as I said before, it is incredible that the article does not contain the Spanish exploration of South America and Central America. It is also necessary to add the exploration of Asia. Pls add it.
- 17:0017:00, 5 October 2017 diff hist 0 m Conquistador It is necessary to add the Spanish exploration of South America (Essential). It is also necessary to add exploration of Africa. What I edit is not based on my opinion, it is simply that the article is poorly worded and poor information about Spain. In a
- 16:5316:53, 5 October 2017 diff hist −93 Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched
- 16:2316:23, 5 October 2017 diff hist −7 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 16:0816:08, 5 October 2017 diff hist +86 Spanish Empire Added Royal Coat of Arms Tag: Visual edit
- 15:5115:51, 5 October 2017 diff hist −96 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 15:4715:47, 5 October 2017 diff hist −8 m Spanish Empire No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 15:4615:46, 5 October 2017 diff hist +27 m Spanish Empire Total area of this Empire Tag: Visual edit
- 15:2115:21, 5 October 2017 diff hist +89 Spanish Empire No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
30 September 2017
- 12:3812:38, 30 September 2017 diff hist −60 m Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:3612:36, 30 September 2017 diff hist −5 Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:3412:34, 30 September 2017 diff hist −178 m Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:2812:28, 30 September 2017 diff hist +8 m Conquistador Hiperlinks Tag: Visual edit
- 12:2512:25, 30 September 2017 diff hist 0 m Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:2412:24, 30 September 2017 diff hist +105 m Conquistador I have included one more photo. Tag: Visual edit
- 12:2012:20, 30 September 2017 diff hist −38,808 Conquistador Conquistador is a term used for a soldier, explorer, or adventurer that expanded Spain's colonial rule between the 15th and 17th centuries, not Portuguese. Look "Disambiguation": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conquistador_(disambiguation) Tag: Visual edit: Switched
10 September 2017
- 13:5613:56, 10 September 2017 diff hist −11 Anglo-Spanish War (1585–1604) No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
8 September 2017
- 19:0719:07, 8 September 2017 diff hist −13 Conquistador No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 19:0019:00, 8 September 2017 diff hist −37,757 Conquistador The article includes the exploration of Portugal and that is a mistake because it has nothing to do with the figure of the Conqueror, who is Spanish not Portuguese. Tag: Visual edit
- 13:5613:56, 8 September 2017 diff hist −84 m Conquistador Better image of a "Conquistador" Tag: Visual edit
- 13:0513:05, 8 September 2017 diff hist −5 m Spanish Empire I change the old spanish map image. The new image is more complete. Tag: Visual edit