Search results

best known even in the English language and is the best fit for the [[WP:CRITERIA]]: It's what sources [[WP:COMMONNAME|most commonly]] call it and it...

(UTC) #'''Support''' Chelsea per [[WP:AT]], esp [[WP:COMMONNAME]] and [[WP:CRITERIA]]. Reject [[WP:BLP]] as reason. Explanation below. #:*On August 22,...

[[Wikipedia:Article titles]] is the relevant policy page. Specifically, the [[WP:CRITERIA|criteria]] for '''recognizability''', '''naturalness''', and the general...

the other for the foreseeable future - the one that meets the title [[WP:CRITERIA]] (policy) better than the other. In this case, ''far'' better....

fact that it's a station on the LIRR is explained in the article. Per [[WP:CRITERIA]], one of the five characteristics of a "good Wikipedia article title"...

baffling, given that the present names self-evidently don't satisfy [[WP:CRITERIA]]. Just take a moment to think about the situation logically, rather...

website]). ''Czechia'' has always been the better title in terms of [[WP:CRITERIA|the five key article naming criteria]], especially "concision" and "consistency...

this article as a 'massacre' rather than a 'genocide', in violation of [[WP:CRITERIA]]. [[User:122141510|122141510]] ([[User talk:122141510|talk]]) 05:33...

would take time to actually study the policy [[WP:AT]], especially [[WP:CRITERIA]]. The closer is ''obliged'' to discount arguments which are not founded...

opinion titles disambiguated wth “darts player” et al are in violation of [[WP:CRITERIA]] because they are unnecessarily long; the “player” part in those examples...

perhaps elevates consistency to a higher status than is warranted per [[WP:CRITERIA]], and that may be the root problem here. --[[User:Born2cycle|В²C]]...

2024 (UTC) :::::::I do think precision trumps recognizability in the [[WP:CRITERIA]] here—we could retitle [[Ornithology]] to [[Study of birds]], but I...

redirect| William Wright (U.S. politician)}} – Change according to [[WP:CRITERIA]], Consistency. There's a long list of titles in this RM (and not that...

talk:MichaelMaggs|talk]]) 16:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC) ::That goes against [[WP:CRITERIA]] - specifically Precision: "The title unambiguously identifies the...

particular article. This is particularly important for compliance with the [[WP:CRITERIA|naming criteria]]; the very reason RM exists is that the regulars at...

with similar article titles that end with "(web browser)". [<nowiki/>[[WP:CRITERIA]]] [[User:Andibrema|Andibrema]] ([[User talk:Andibrema|talk]]) 13:45...

talk:Ajpolino|talk]]) 19:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC) *'''Oppose''' per [[WP:CRITERIA]]. "crap" can mean anything, including parts of en.Wikipedia. "Feces"...

terms of raw numbers. Looking at the arguments a clear invocation of [[WP:CRITERIA]] is made for support (particularly that the new title is more precise...

the gravity of the situation") rather than referencing, for example, [[WP:CRITERIA]]. Again, you wrongly infer that what I said "certainly implies" I think...

style="color: black">buidhe</span>]] and, primarily, '''recognizability''' per [[WP:CRITERIA]]. [[User:Errantius|Errantius]] ([[User talk:Errantius|talk]]) 00:32...