User contributions for Thucydides411

A user with 6,776 edits. Account created on 22 October 2006.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

23 October 2023

8 October 2023

5 October 2023

22 February 2023

21 February 2023

20 January 2023

11 December 2022

9 December 2022

  • 22:4222:42, 9 December 2022 diff hist +32 ByteDance→‎Surveillance and censorship concerns: Actually, there's no reason to even use the inflammatory term "genocide" here. The use of the term is already contentious at "Uyghur genocide", given that Wikipedia's position is that we cannot claim there is a genocide. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 22:3922:39, 9 December 2022 diff hist −4 ByteDanceUndid revision 1126227045 by Amigao (talk) In fact, an RfC at "Uyghur genocide" found that the sources so not support a factual claim that there is a genocide, and the we cannot make such a claim in Wikivoice. "The ongoing genocide" is a Wikivoice claim that there is a genocide, and therefore directly violates the RfC result. Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 09:2409:24, 9 December 2022 diff hist +4 The Grayzone→‎Content: Again, cannot claim existence of genocide in Wikivoice (as an RfC at "Uyghur genocide" article concluded). Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 09:2309:23, 9 December 2022 diff hist −1,415 The GrayzoneCannot claim in Wikivoice that there is a Uyghur genocide. This has been addressed at "Uyghur genocide", where an RfC determined we cannot claim existence of genocide in this case, and at "genocide denial", where there was a discussion of the fact that claim of "genocide denial" is a Wikivoice statement that genocide is taking place. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

4 December 2022

3 December 2022

1 October 2022

30 September 2022

26 September 2022

  • 18:4918:49, 26 September 2022 diff hist +16 Persecution of Uyghurs in China→‎Denial: This is an obvious violation of neutrality, and of the RfC that concluded that we cannot call this a "genocide" in Wikivoice. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 18:4418:44, 26 September 2022 diff hist −7 Persecution of Uyghurs in China→‎Chinese government response: "Genocide denial" is a term that describes denial of widely acknowledged genocides. Use of the term strongly implies, in Wikivoice, that there is a genocide against the Uyghurs. There was an RfC that concluded that we cannot label this a "genocide" in Wikivoice. Use of the term "genocide denial" appears to be an attempt to circumvent the RfC. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
  • 15:3715:37, 26 September 2022 diff hist −1,416 The Grayzone"Denial of the Uyghur genocide" implies, in Wikivoice, that there is a genocide. See RfC at Uyghur Genocide article, which resulted in decision that we cannot claim, in Wikivoice, that there is a genocide. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

25 September 2022

4 September 2022

22 August 2022

25 July 2022

24 July 2022

  • 09:1909:19, 24 July 2022 diff hist +3,068 The 1619 ProjectRestoring (with some modifications) references to critical interviews which sparked the historical debate, and which have been very widely commented on in secondary sources. Along with the letter to the Times and the Politico essay, these are the probably most prominent and commented-on criticisms. Removing them because some dislike the politics of the source is wrong. Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor

21 July 2022

30 May 2022

  • 05:1705:17, 30 May 2022 diff hist +50 Adrian ZenzUndid revision 1090491354 by Mhawk10 (talk) RV restoration of POV text. Obviously cannot claim "genocide" in Wikivoice, and fact that VoC is a US govt think tank is relevant. Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

29 May 2022

  • 14:3814:38, 29 May 2022 diff hist +50 Adrian ZenzNPOV: 1. Cannot put claim of genocide in Wikivoice. 2. Connection of think tank to US government. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

28 May 2022

23 May 2022

20 May 2022

19 May 2022

  • 11:4311:43, 19 May 2022 diff hist +81 The 1619 ProjectLast I checked, ballot presence of the authors did not determine notability of a publication. NYT has zero ballot presence, as far as I'm aware. These interviews are of some of the most highly recognized historians of the Revolution, and have been widely cited in other publications. The venue of the interviews has also been widely commented on in other media. Tags: Manual revert Reverted 2017 wikitext editor

29 April 2022

26 April 2022

25 April 2022

  • 19:2819:28, 25 April 2022 diff hist +5 Putinversteher→‎The scope of the term and its usage: Die Welt is one of the most prominent conservative newspapers in Germany. It is market liberal (meaning it is generally skeptical of government regulation of markets), but calling it a "liberal newspaper" will confuse many readers. In American English, "liberal" means something very different. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)