User contributions for Ex turpi causa
A user with 89 edits. Account created on 8 October 2014.
11 December 2019
- 22:3922:39, 11 December 2019 diff hist −232 Cuba →Economy: removed biased citation Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
1 September 2019
- 10:4610:46, 1 September 2019 diff hist +1 Russian interference in the 2016 Brexit referendum →Before the vote: Fixed grammar Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit
14 January 2018
- 14:2214:22, 14 January 2018 diff hist +43 Andrew Chetcuti Fixed typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit
3 May 2016
- 00:1900:19, 3 May 2016 diff hist −5 Seumas Milne →Capitalism and democracy: Typo fixed Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 April 2016
- 01:1601:16, 5 April 2016 diff hist +2 Fixed exchange rate system No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
31 March 2016
- 16:5116:51, 31 March 2016 diff hist +89 Law Biased to end the summary section with a quote from Marx, or any other political/legal philosopher, rather than assert neutrally, as far as is practicable, the current general position of what law 'is.'
19 February 2016
- 17:5017:50, 19 February 2016 diff hist −7 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Development: Fixed Latin translation at the end of the quote in Development section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
22 December 2015
- 17:5817:58, 22 December 2015 diff hist −1 m Racism No edit summary
6 December 2015
18 November 2015
17 November 2015
16 October 2015
- 18:1618:16, 16 October 2015 diff hist +150 m Ad hominem →Criticism of ad hominem as a fallacy: Expanding and answering the "how?" flag with regards Charles Taylor's perspective on ad hominems in moral reasoning.
8 October 2015
- 18:3518:35, 8 October 2015 diff hist +4 m The Economist →Opinions
7 October 2015
- 16:1616:16, 7 October 2015 diff hist +43 Environmental vegetarianism →Criticisms: Added source to second line in this section
- 16:1416:14, 7 October 2015 diff hist +66 Environmental vegetarianism →Criticisms: Source added for first line of this section
26 September 2015
- 22:3222:32, 26 September 2015 diff hist +31 m The Economist →Opinions: qualifying who has described it as neoliberal given that source is rather biased
18 May 2015
- 15:5015:50, 18 May 2015 diff hist +5 m Edinburgh Law School No edit summary
- 15:4915:49, 18 May 2015 diff hist 0 m Edinburgh Law School No edit summary
18 April 2015
- 10:0210:02, 18 April 2015 diff hist +64 Humanities Completed end of sentence in law section beginning with "And law is economics..." to line up with same blurb on Social Science article.
30 March 2015
- 15:3915:39, 30 March 2015 diff hist +1 m Sortition No edit summary
9 February 2015
- 23:3123:31, 9 February 2015 diff hist 0 m Law Moved Lady Justice photo insert code so first footnote in text appears logically as [1]
26 January 2015
- 21:1121:11, 26 January 2015 diff hist 0 m Edinburgh Law School No edit summary
16 January 2015
- 11:2211:22, 16 January 2015 diff hist −5 m Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership →Proposed contents
5 December 2014
- 15:1715:17, 5 December 2014 diff hist +333 Proportional representation Discussed in Talk, under Neutrality in Lead topic
3 December 2014
- 22:0022:00, 3 December 2014 diff hist +99 m Proportional representation Inserted full citation for footnote 13
- 19:5519:55, 3 December 2014 diff hist +9 m Proportional representation No edit summary
- 18:0318:03, 3 December 2014 diff hist 0 m Proportional representation Edited date for use of STV in Malta to match source cited
- 17:5917:59, 3 December 2014 diff hist −662 Proportional representation Changes discussed in Talk, under section regarding second-to-last paragraph in Lead (Neutrality)
25 November 2014
- 18:2518:25, 25 November 2014 diff hist +259 Proportional representation Added line to second to last paragraph in lead, counter-balancing the evident bias in rest of that paragraph to more accurate reflect content of article as a whole.
19 November 2014
- 16:3316:33, 19 November 2014 diff hist +34 Proportional representation Undid revision 634207032 by BalCoder (talk) The source also doesn't say exactly what is written. We should keep it neutral in the absence of a clear stance from the source noted.
12 November 2014
- 12:5212:52, 12 November 2014 diff hist +517 Democratization of knowledge Began expansion of article to remove biased tone which appears to emphasise only benefits to the topic. Balanced the Lead and added to History section.
- 10:5410:54, 12 November 2014 diff hist −1 m Proportional representation Removed "s" at end of "transfer" in second to last paragraph of the Summary.
- 10:5310:53, 12 November 2014 diff hist +35 Proportional representation Made second to last paragraph of Summary less biased and less assertive towards the point of view that PR is a sort of political panacea. Clarified this in the paragraph by adding the word "some" before "political scientists" in the first sentence etc.
