User contributions for 122.x.x.x
Appearance
Results for 122.x.x.x talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 229 edits. Account created on 17 January 2012.
2 February 2012
- 04:2004:20, 2 February 2012 diff hist +132 User talk:Snowded →Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard: Do you agree that "Sydactive" is fake?
- 03:1003:10, 2 February 2012 diff hist +990 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Alleged disruption by User:122.x.x.x/122.108.140.210: The advice to compile a list of reliable sources and engage in a reasoned discussion.
- 02:4802:48, 2 February 2012 diff hist +66 User:122.x.x.x add previous ip address current
- 02:0002:00, 2 February 2012 diff hist +548 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: Alleged disruption by User:122.x.x.x/122.108.140.210
- 01:0501:05, 2 February 2012 diff hist +337 User talk:Snowded →Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard: Please look the edit history of Sydactive more closely and see if you can detect that it is fake.
- 00:4400:44, 2 February 2012 diff hist +190 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Ah, well.: Have a look at the edit history of {{vandal|Sydactive}}. Its a blatant example of a strawsock attempt
1 February 2012
- 20:2920:29, 1 February 2012 diff hist +928 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Ah, well.: sock-puppeteer pretends to support to other editors in an uncritical or exaggerated way in order to muddy the waters and make their own position seem more rational.
- 13:4513:45, 1 February 2012 diff hist +1,553 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: Proposed structured workshop similar to the one run in 2006
- 11:2411:24, 1 February 2012 diff hist −21 User:122.x.x.x remove unfounded accusations - no SPI made
- 11:2211:22, 1 February 2012 diff hist +530 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Additional evidence of commercial involvement: make a case to SPI. Otherwise, stop your unfounded accusations of sockpuppetry expressed or implied
- 11:0411:04, 1 February 2012 diff hist +335 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Example SPA accounts: As stated above, I have nothing to do with any of those accounts. If you think I am connected with any other account then please submit an SPI, otherwise, stop making your unfounded accusations.
- 04:3004:30, 1 February 2012 diff hist +14 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: +{{unresolved}}
- 04:2304:23, 1 February 2012 diff hist +29 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Additional evidence of meat puppetry: (and practitioners)
31 January 2012
- 21:1421:14, 31 January 2012 diff hist +134 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Additional evidence of meat puppetry: We need a stability point.
- 21:0921:09, 31 January 2012 diff hist +690 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Additional evidence of meat puppetry: Then we were left with the question of finding a definition that best represents the discourse concerned with NLP.
- 16:1616:16, 31 January 2012 diff hist +193 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Additional evidence of meat puppetry: I always thought Oxford English Dictionary was an independent reliable source for definitions
- 15:3715:37, 31 January 2012 diff hist +1,289 N Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/122.x.x.x ←Created page with '{{subst:SPI report |checkuser=no <!-- Please do not enter anything in the subject/headline box! If you want to request checkuser, simply change the line above t...'
- 15:0715:07, 31 January 2012 diff hist +162 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →NLP in teaching and education: CfBT Education Trust is more respectable than simply self-published source but not as reliable as a high impact peer-reviewed journal.
- 05:4005:40, 31 January 2012 diff hist +909 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →NLP in teaching and education: I wonder if this could be considered a valid source for a (tiny) minority view as per the WP:WEIGHT.
- 03:1103:11, 31 January 2012 diff hist +4 m Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →NLP in teaching and education: not
- 03:1003:10, 31 January 2012 diff hist +1,327 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →NLP in teaching and education: I think this explains the different conclusions
- 02:2202:22, 31 January 2012 diff hist +283 User talk:Fifelfoo →Reliable Sources/Noticeboard formatting: new section
- 02:1402:14, 31 January 2012 diff hist +2,321 Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard →NLP in teaching and education: new section
30 January 2012
- 23:1523:15, 30 January 2012 diff hist +553 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: I agree with the removal of those commercial links except for maybe the 1996 interview of John Grinder
- 22:3222:32, 30 January 2012 diff hist +1,318 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: Show me the diffs where I have advocated for NLP.
- 12:5712:57, 30 January 2012 diff hist +1,110 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: I'm willing to assume good faith with you (Snowded) again but you cannot keep autoreverting my edits and keep accusing me of things I have no control over.
- 11:5211:52, 30 January 2012 diff hist +558 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: I will support your efforts in guarding against that sort of disruption.
- 07:2307:23, 30 January 2012 diff hist +1,463 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: That is far from a fair and balanced treatment of the subject according to the sources.
- 04:4804:48, 30 January 2012 diff hist +501 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: arbcom final decision about ascribing controversial viewpoints
- 03:0903:09, 30 January 2012 diff hist +135 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: Congru I would not doubt your authenticity if you used reliable sources more consistently and used diffs to give weight to your views.
- 03:0503:05, 30 January 2012 diff hist +438 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: Wait for an independent administrator to comment.
- 02:5502:55, 30 January 2012 diff hist +655 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: I completely agree with the arbitration findings and suggested rememdies
- 02:4602:46, 30 January 2012 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: repeated
- 02:3002:30, 30 January 2012 diff hist +831 User talk:122.x.x.x →please use the talk page: I do believe that if all the editors on the NLP and related articles followed those remedies it would be a much better editing environment in the long run.
- 02:1902:19, 30 January 2012 diff hist +4,292 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: response to Snowded and ISTB351
- 01:2101:21, 30 January 2012 diff hist +179 User talk:122.x.x.x →please use the talk page: It was not a revert at all. The edit contained wording to satisfy your objections
29 January 2012
- 23:2823:28, 29 January 2012 diff hist −35 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Nocross 2008?: sorry I forgot to sign in
- 22:4922:49, 29 January 2012 diff hist −123 Neuro-linguistic programming as a comprimise, I still use the word sought but use the word found to indicate their results.
- 22:2422:24, 29 January 2012 diff hist +525 m Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: diff to request to snowded to stop
- 22:1622:16, 29 January 2012 diff hist +300 User talk:Lam Kin Keung No edit summary
- 22:1422:14, 29 January 2012 diff hist +279 User talk:Snowded →The Signpost: 23 January 2012: subst:ANI-notice
- 22:1422:14, 29 January 2012 diff hist +21 User talk:Snowded No edit summary
- 22:0922:09, 29 January 2012 diff hist +260 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Plagiarism by Witkowski: Please provide a quote from that paper showing the conclusion specific to NLP you speak of. That way we can be sure that it is not just my opinion or yours.
- 22:0422:04, 29 January 2012 diff hist +91 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: signed
- 22:0322:03, 29 January 2012 diff hist +4,045 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →unpleasant editing environment at Neuro-linguistic programming: new section
- 20:5920:59, 29 January 2012 diff hist +158 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Plagiarism by Witkowski: I'm not asking for an opinion. I'm asking for the facts.
- 13:2513:25, 29 January 2012 diff hist +25 N The Necker cube Necker Cube
- 13:2413:24, 29 January 2012 diff hist +173 Cognitive science →Perception and action: + checker shadow
- 12:0512:05, 29 January 2012 diff hist +553 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Plagiarism by Witkowski: We need to just establish some basic facts here.
- 06:5206:52, 29 January 2012 diff hist +430 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Plagiarism by Witkowski: Snowded said we need to report conclusions and is the reason I asked for clarification