User contributions for 190.46.98.195

17 January 2013

• 02:0502:05, 17 January 2013 diff hist −14‎ Lawrence Lessig ‎ rm pov
• 02:0402:04, 17 January 2013 diff hist +3‎ Rudyard Kipling ‎ replace subjective assertions with objective facts
• 02:0102:01, 17 January 2013 diff hist +22‎ Ansel Adams ‎ replace subjective assertions with objective facts
• 01:5901:59, 17 January 2013 diff hist −27‎ Pitcairn Islands ‎ rm pov
• 01:5801:58, 17 January 2013 diff hist −22‎ John Barry (composer) ‎ rm pov, and also rm completely pointless brackets
• 01:5701:57, 17 January 2013 diff hist −19‎ Tucows ‎ rm pov
• 01:5601:56, 17 January 2013 diff hist −17‎ Kenneth Branagh ‎ rm pov
• 01:5601:56, 17 January 2013 diff hist +6‎ Rachel Whiteread ‎ rm pov
• 01:5301:53, 17 January 2013 diff hist −9‎ Nvidia ‎ rm pov
• 01:5201:52, 17 January 2013 diff hist −12‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ rm pov.

10 January 2013

• 03:2003:20, 10 January 2013 diff hist −351‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ you can leave them to make up their own mind, thanks.
• 02:5902:59, 10 January 2013 diff hist +562‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ →‎Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

9 January 2013

• 21:1221:12, 9 January 2013 diff hist +464‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:190.46.98.195 reported by User:Chaheel Riens (Result: )
• 21:0921:09, 9 January 2013 diff hist +352‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎ →‎Opening paragraph
• 21:0821:08, 9 January 2013 diff hist −12‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ rm pov.
• 18:5218:52, 9 January 2013 diff hist +1,035‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎No edit summary
• 18:4718:47, 9 January 2013 diff hist +11‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ Undid revision 532207766 by Theroadislong (talk) you are deliberately compromising the quality of the encyclopaedia because you don't understand NPOV. That's vandalism.
• 18:4518:45, 9 January 2013 diff hist +402‎ Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ‎ →‎User:190.46.98.195 reported by User:Chaheel Riens (Result: )
• 17:1117:11, 9 January 2013 diff hist +11‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ no matter what source you find that statement in, it remains obviously a statement of opinion and not a fact. "Avoid stating opinions as facts", says the core policy which you clearly haven't understood.
• 17:0817:08, 9 January 2013 diff hist +395‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎ →‎Opening paragraph
• 16:2316:23, 9 January 2013 diff hist +736‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ →‎January 2013
• 16:1816:18, 9 January 2013 diff hist −12‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ That this is POV is not an opinion, it's a fact. You not understanding what POV is is your problem, not mine. you bizarrely edit warring to impose POV is what is disruptive. this is not a controversial edit in any way.
• 16:1716:17, 9 January 2013 diff hist +573‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎ →‎Opening paragraph

8 January 2013

• 17:3317:33, 8 January 2013 diff hist −116‎ 2003 European heatwave ‎ →‎United Kingdom: this is not a sentence, it's not formatted properly, it's not put into any kind of context and the report is about the second highest temperature recorded in the UK, not the highest.
• 12:5112:51, 8 January 2013 diff hist −15‎ Autocorrection ‎ →‎Disadvantages: rm pov
• 12:4312:43, 8 January 2013 diff hist −154‎ Autocorrection ‎ redundant. no need to describe what can be found at links.
• 06:1806:18, 8 January 2013 diff hist −151‎ Commonwealth of Nations ‎ much too vague a statement. considered by whom? foreign, in inverted commas? the meaning is completely unclear.

7 January 2013

• 16:4216:42, 7 January 2013 diff hist −84‎ Naegleriasis ‎ it may have been described as that. it is not known as that.
• 06:0606:06, 7 January 2013 diff hist −8‎ Naegleriasis ‎ it is pointless to use both a vague term and a specific term. one suffices
• 06:0506:05, 7 January 2013 diff hist −46‎ Naegleriasis ‎ rm childish nonsense

6 January 2013

• 21:3721:37, 6 January 2013 diff hist −79‎ Kasatka ‎ Undid revision 528722847 by Wickedangry (talk) don't fucking revert for no reason.
• 20:4220:42, 6 January 2013 diff hist −264‎ Lei Feng ‎ citations are for references to support the facts, not for extraneous information that directly contradicts the main body of the text. If that's what the phrase translates as, then put the correct translation in the article.

5 January 2013

• 20:5120:51, 5 January 2013 diff hist −7‎ Colossus of Rhodes ‎ no need to separate this important and relevant fact from the rest of the sentence.
• 15:3515:35, 5 January 2013 diff hist −45‎ Kenny Everett ‎ "Avoid stating opinions as facts". If you don't understand core policies of wikipedia, don't edit.
• 15:2915:29, 5 January 2013 diff hist −12‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ applying core policy. "Avoid stating opinions as facts".
• 15:2715:27, 5 January 2013 diff hist +518‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ →‎January 2013
• 15:2415:24, 5 January 2013 diff hist −279‎ Tom Segalstad ‎ letters to newspapers are rarely notable. and you don't need to list all the specialist subdivisions of what he taught. that is puffery. geology and geophysics covers it all perfectly adequately.
• 15:2115:21, 5 January 2013 diff hist +939‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎ →‎Opening paragraph
• 05:1205:12, 5 January 2013 diff hist −76‎ Tom Segalstad ‎ rm puffery
• 05:1105:11, 5 January 2013 diff hist −203‎ Tom Segalstad ‎ Undid revision 526475158 by Silver seren (talk) not really
• 05:0905:09, 5 January 2013 diff hist +839‎ Talk:Cleo Rocos ‎ →‎Opening paragraph
• 04:5804:58, 5 January 2013 diff hist −12‎ Cleo Rocos ‎ rm pov. what kind of bizarre mindset do you have to have to want to force blatant pov into an article when it's so incredibly easy to avoid it?
• 04:5604:56, 5 January 2013 diff hist −282‎ Kenny Everett ‎ "best known for" = pov. if you can't understand that, you shouldn't be editing. You've got a reference for it? wonderful. I've got a reference that says Citizen Kane is the best film ever made. Wanna put that in the Citizen Kane article?
• 04:5204:52, 5 January 2013 diff hist −16‎ Assia Wevill ‎ "is best known for" = pov, obviously. But apparently a lot of people are no longer able to understand the core policy of npov.

5 December 2012

• 04:0104:01, 5 December 2012 diff hist +508‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ →‎Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
• 00:3500:35, 5 December 2012 diff hist +1‎ Kenny Everett ‎ sp
• 00:3400:34, 5 December 2012 diff hist −96‎ Kenny Everett ‎ "Pending discussion"..? what's to discuss? NPOV is not optional.

4 December 2012

• 22:0422:04, 4 December 2012 diff hist −79‎ Kasatka ‎ what the hell is "brief" in inverted commas supposed to mean? removed vague unquantified statement and replaced with simple reporting of fact.
• 22:0122:01, 4 December 2012 diff hist −96‎ Kenny Everett ‎ Can't begin to imagine why you want to insist on inserting POV. What is your problem with simply stating the facts? I don't think you understand NPOV at all.
• 22:0022:00, 4 December 2012 diff hist +644‎ User talk:190.46.98.195 ‎ →‎Reliable sources