Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satyasagara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Fenix down (talk) 17:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Satyasagara

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL, WP:GNG. Currently known news stories from reliable sources does not provide in-depth coverage about Satyasagara as of now. See [1] and [2]. Mario Jump 83! 11:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Per MarioJump83, formerly called SMB99thx. –Cupper52^Discuss! 12:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 13:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL as manager of a team from a fully-professional league, and there is coverage at Times of India, The Hindu and Hindustan Times, amongst others. Note all those sources are from the first page of results from a very, very quick Google search for "satyasagara chennai city fc", showing that nominator has not complied with WP:BEFORE. Article needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 15:24, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:BEFORE search reveals several reliable sources in which the subject is either the entire coverage or receives significant coverage. The subject passes the basic requirement of notability here on the encyclopedia. The article could use some improving but AfD is not article cleanup. Subject is notable therefore it should stay. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 15:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete one source is never enough to establish a passing of GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I just tagged {{Notability}} to the article. Mario Jump 83! 08:37, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - manager of a top professional Indian team so passes NFOOTBALL and has an active career at that level, it wouldn't make sense to delete right now Spiderone 13:08, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can say this should be closed as a Keep, since I didn't do much things before nominating this article for deletion as well as actually passing NFOOTBALL. What a learning experience for my first AfD. I'm planning to expand this article later. Mario Jump 83! 05:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MarioJump83 Are you withdrawing your nomination with the above comment? - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. I'm not withdrawing the AfD with that comment, but I want to notice that the keeps has more stronger arguments than the delete ones, so I think this could end up as keep. Mario Jump 83! 07:34, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had removed my comment after seeing the Delete votes. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added few WP:RS. He passes WP:NFOOTBALL. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:41, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.