Talk:Ptolemy's intense diatonic scale

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Music theory C‑class

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Classical Greece and Rome C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Aesthetics C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Aesthetics

Raising?

Shouldn't it be LOWERING E, A & B? The Pythagorean E is way too sharp, even compared to the equal temperament E which is still 13.7 cents sharper than the pure beatless E of Just Intonation. 120.21.50.167 (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC) A banned Wankerpedian[reply]

Ptolemy's intense diatonic is different?

According to "Solomon, J 1999, Ptolemy's Harmonics: Translation and Commentary. Brill, Leiden." Ptolemy's intense diatonic has the following structure: t - T - s - T - t - T - s not T - t - s - T - t - T - s although the carving up of the tetrachord uses the same intervals but it is symmetric. --kupirijo (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not new at all

Ptolemy, like so many Yavanas before, stole Vedic wisdom and falsely claimed ownership. Otherwise known as plagiarism, a crime in Western courts.

I am a musician. It makes no difference tuning my digital keyboard to GANDHAR tuning or PTOLEMY'S INTENSE DIATONIC. They're both exactly the same.

Before you edit war my correction, grab yourself a digital keyboard and try it yourself. Then go and fuck yourself when you realise how fucking wrong you were all along. No need to apologise. You're obviously stupid. Ningnongtwit (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]