Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriele Caliari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 17:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriele Caliari

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The son of a famous father, but according to the article not notable. Rathfelder (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Rathfelder:, I found a work that appears to be by him, in the collection of the Art Institute of Chicago (see article). Is that the right Gabriele Caliari? Possibly (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's irrelevant that he's not as famous as his father. His works are in the collections of several museums and have received critical attention, like [1], and he has an entry in Benezit. [2] If I took five more minutes I could very provide more sources. A quick look in JSTOR showed many mentions. Vexations (talk) 18:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It seems rather odd that according to the article "he seems to have painted few pictures of his own, and devoted himself chiefly to commerce."Rathfelder (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Rathfelder, That looks like a rather poor translation of "Figlio maggiore del più noto Paolo Veronese, lavorò in collaborazione con questi ma anche da sé" from the Italian version of the article. Vexations (talk) 18:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets notability criteria per WP:ARTIST and GNG. The number of works he created, nor the nature of his "day job" has no bearing. He's notable because he is included in a National/International Dictionary of Biography (Benezit). Vexations has found sources on JSTOR; these could be used to improve the article. He is in the collection of the British Museum.[3] and the National Gallery of Art.[4] The few works of his in existence are probably also in notable museum collections, just a guess but if they survived this long, I would imagine so. Netherzone (talk) 18:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC) Additional comment, on a second look, it may just be his biography at the British Museum, and several prints that were made "after" his works. Netherzone (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite happy to withdraw this, especially as there is another referencce - and perhaps someone could improve the wording? Rathfelder (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I added a source in Italian, a XIX century book which devotes to him a chapter.--Pampuco (talk) 21:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.