Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mockelberg

Mockelberg

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally G14 CSD, but was disputed. This page does not meet the criteria for a DAB or a set index article. Servers no navigation function, only entries are nn fictional characters w/o articles. // Timothy :: talk 11:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. // Timothy :: talk 11:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Not disambiguating anything (though I assume you meant G14?). --IWI (talk) 11:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.This is a surname article, should keep it, because this page records the surname Mockelberg's information, the information is very important, if there is something wrong with this page, please modify it, thank you. --Lord Djibril (talk) 1:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete to be a surname article, we would need actual reliable sources that actually discuss the surname. These are lacking. In fact, since both of the alleged uses involve fictional characters, I am less than convinced this is a real surname at all. There are very few fictional surnames worth having articles on, and to justify such as article they need a fictional back story, not just being dreamed into existence for one character. Now, this may be a real surname had by real people, but no evidence of that has been presented.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:55, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.This article is reliable already, although the page is records about some fictional characters, so shouldn't have the double-standard to judge the article. Maybe you think that the surname displayed on this page is unnecessary or too unpopular, but this surname is still used by some people and should not be deleted casually. I guess the reason why the author created this page is that everyone can recognize this surname. This article without any malicious intent. I agree and admire the author’s approach. In last, I urge everyone to help keep this page, thank you. --Everstonerelm (talk) 5:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC)