Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystic songs of Sylhet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:19, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mystic songs of Sylhet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is poorly written, uses trivial mentions as references, and can be merged to larger articles such as Music of Bangladesh due to the lack of depth. This article should be deleted. UserNumber (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of music-related deletion discussions. UserNumber (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. UserNumber (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 January 16. UserNumber (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep All the nom concerns are about the current state of the article which per WP:BEFORE "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD." are not reasons for delete. That issue aside. My google search did not find much, but looking at the other language page the subject seems to meet WP:GNG there are multiple references, and a well constructed article. Given what I see on the other language page, the English article looks like a stub about a notable subject that needs to be expanded by someone familiar with the subject and the language. Jeepday (talk) 17:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Jeepday. Possibly we need to add a confirmation box ensuring the nominator has performed an adequate WP:BEFORE to AfD submissions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:09, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jeepday and WP:HEY. The article now has 7 citations (5 in Bengali and offline, but allowed by WP:NONENG and WP:OFFLINE). Narky Blert (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.