Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Naylor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Fenix down (talk | contribs) at 17:15, 5 February 2021 (→‎Michael Naylor: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Naylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prolific referee at tiers 2 to 4 of the English league system but, in my WP:BEFORE search, I only found run-of-the-mill coverage like this or just name checks in match reports. Coverage across ProQuest also completely lacks depth. No evidence that Naylor comes close to passing WP:GNG. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:53, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:54, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:55, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.