Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Munir Cheema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tahir Munir Cheema

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

utter promotional nonsense about a guy who fails WP:NPOL as a minor local politician. I can find 0 sources in Urdu or English, much less sources that actually cover him. CUPIDICAE💕 12:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As per nom, minor local politician who fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC and WP:NPOL. Why WP:A7 and WP:G1 were declined is beyond me. --John B123 (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Well he is as far as I can tell the top government official in a place with over 200,000 people. If we were talking about a place this size in the US, this would absolutely be dragged through AfD, not speedied in any way. If this person were connected with New Jersey, Louisiana or Dedham, Massachusetts, it would be a long drawn out fight and it might well be kept.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete he is a local level politician and we do not have the level of coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.