Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mika Salmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 15:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mika Salmi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The gentleman fails our notability threshold. He appears to be a WP:ROTM businessman, doming his job well, but not meeting WP:N. Fiddle Faddle 13:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For sure, the article has issues: poorly written, poorly referenced, likely COI editing, etc. But if (and yes, it is an 'if', given the dearth of references) all that is stated is actually true, the person is clearly real-life notable; it's then just a question of satisfying WP:GNG. Most of the sources listed under 'External links' (sadly, not cited via footnotes in the usual manner) are dead, but one or two remain, mainly the Vanity Fair piece. Also, there's this half-hour documentary by the Finnish public broadcaster Yle. To call him 'Run-of-the-mill' seems harsh IMO, regardless of whether WP's notability can be satisfied. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep dependent on being rescued with additional sources. Bearian (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Please note the entry has been revised to address notability and improve the entry. Dead links have been removed and multiple references added. Please advise if more revisions are required. alexnadal. — Preceding undated comment added 16:50, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.