User talk:Drollwor

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Daddy Yankee. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Daddy Yankee shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 19:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Don Omar, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Rob van vee 11:46, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Don Omar; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Wisin & Yandel, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 04:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Don Omar. Rob van vee 04:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Don Omar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Rob van vee 04:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

English

Can you speak it? Rob van vee 18:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If so, communication with fellow concerned editors is not optional. Please read WP:V. You need to reliably source all your edits. Rob van vee 04:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to communicate with you so that we can discuss this. Ignoring me will not be beneficial to you in any way. Rob van vee 04:47, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Drollwor (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I Have only given the information correct y with reference.

Drollwor (talk) 04:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No you have not and you are dangerously close to being blocked if you continue. Is that what you really want? Just saying it's sourced in your edit summaries without an actual source is disruptive. An example of this is your unsourced genres at Don Omar. If you continue on the path you are on, you will be blocked. There are other problems you need to address but let's start there. Rob van vee 05:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I tell you for example that in the page of AllMuisc is one reference about the artist for his versatilite. Drollwor (talk) 05:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]