User talk:Favre1fan93

Archives

2012 - 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Favre1fan93}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Hi (WV)

Hi,

I've just read the discussion I wasn't part of regarding the billing and after reading that I feel like an apology is fit from my side. I've missed that and therefore said stuff you might had said before. Reading it, I've found that you got a point that it's best to wait until march 5 when we got the full show to change crediting depending on appearances. So, hereby an apology for my hasty/pushy behavior. Scenarioschrijver20 (talk) 20:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. As has been stated, the credits are the definite source to show what the "main" cast is, and while this series is unconventional, it does do that. And it's also hard to judge a series off of only a small portion of its episodes that have released. Rupp has indicated she's most likely appearing in more episodes, and the same could be true for Melamed. Come the final episode's release, another discussion can be started if we as editors need to reevaluate how actors appeared in the credits. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just saw you archived discussion number 1 million regarding main cast. Which I understand. Btw, didn't we collectively agree to keep off any cast discussion until the last episode is out on march 5th? Scenarioschrijver20 (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I have noticed on your bio that you work on a lot of content that revolves around superheroes and comics. I need help with getting my article about a media organization that covers these topics published. Your help is welcomed, but if you do not want to, that is also totally okay. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:New_Rockstars TonyStank123456789 (talk) 02:01, 28 January 2021 (UTC)TonyStank123456789[reply]

WandaVision

Hey, you may still be getting to it, but there are a couple missing refs at WandaVision from your last edit. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamstom.97: Did this fix it? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry I should have realised it was just typos and not missing refs. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All good, no worries!! Sometime in the heat of it all copy/pasting across articles, I get the names messed up. Thanks for letting me know, because it could have been completely missing refs. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft redirect to mainspace

Wouldn't it be better to delete drafts which you don't think are worthwile than to redirect them to mainspace? I don't think drafts redirecting to actual pages is supposed to be done.★Trekker (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace articles can't redirect to the draftspace, but drafspace can redirect to the main. At least when moving a draft to an existing mainspace article, I do find it worthwhile to establish the old draft name as a redirect in the immediate after the move to ensure existing links (if at all) are maintained. Down the line (one month, 3 months?) it's probably okay to then delete. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Good work everywhere. I appreciate you for all of this. Starzoner (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wandavision

It is getting ridiculous that every few days a newbie editor decided to start the same discussion about the main cast. This is WP:BLUDGEON. And the ones agree with that person seem to be also be newbies editors. — YoungForever^(talk) 17:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to wonder too if MarvelousMusician397 and Anubhab030119 might be socks. In my eyes, those are the two that are both relatively new accounts and they seem to be constantly commenting to agree with each other. I will look into their edits to see if I feel a proper SPI is warranted. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reversiones

Oye amigo, si es que hablas español, tengo que preguntarte algo, por que reviertes mis ediciones? --Lil Pablo 2007 (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Pablo 2007, sorry amigo. I don't think Favre speaks Spanish. Even I don't. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

La razón ya fue explicada en cada resumen de edición, pero tus principales ediciones fueron agregar sinopsis a las películas del Universo cinematográfico de Marvel. Estas secciones resultan redudantes, debido a que ya hay una sección que detalla la trama completa, sumado a un pequeño resumen de dos líneas en la sección inicial. Sinopsis como esta en Spider-Man: Homecoming tienen oraciones con juicios de valor (versión de es.wiki) con muchas palabras que deben ser evitadas (versión de es.wiki), además de que fueron sacadas de otro sitio web sin estar entre comillas ni tener la referencia adecuada, lo que lo convierte en una violación de derechos de autor. —El Millo (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Facu-el Millo for responding. I put your response in Google Translate and it seems you answered as necessary. Thanks! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TV

Do you have an objective reason for your reversions besides "I want it to be inacurate"? There is zero reason why the section can't just be "television".★Trekker (talk) 18:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit was reverted again by someone else, and their edit summary essentially sums up what I was going to say: the vast majority of the properties in the section are series, and the special is clearly noted, but the heading shouldn't be changed nor that content moved out because of it. As well, "Television" is not descriptive enough, because television what? Are they TV films? Documentaries? No and series again is the best descriptor, while also considering how we have the related article List of Marvel Cinematic Universe television series. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RE Spiderman Move

Hi User,

Hope you are keeping well. I am just asking what is the logic / plan behind the migration of the Page from Untitled Spiderman Far From Home sequel to Spiderman No Way Home?

I note you asked me to stop copying and pasting. Why is that the case? The article needs its new heading since the Movie title is confirmed. The rest of the article needs to remain the same therefore the copy and paste move was simply to make the page with the new title identical to that of the previous. Likewise the previous page I had redirect to the new one so any article linking to it should remain to work.

Please let me know in a little more detail what your thoughts/plan is on this.

Best wishes, John

-- JohnGormleyJG (✉) 18:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]