Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simonds of Botesdale (3rd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 23:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Simonds of Botesdale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. SK2242 (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SK2242 (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I am an enthusiastic and unabashed deletionist at the best of times, and an article like this just really helps my case. Sadly Wikipedia can't be a depository for each and every company which runs buses through regional streets and this article is clearly not notable enough for inclusion. The sources, which are plentiful, are nonetheless mostly primary source or unremarkable. Fails CORP. doktorb wordsdeeds 21:49, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Should've been booted the 2nd time round!, Hopefully third time lucky!. Cannot find any evidence of any notability, fails BASIC/GNG and NCORP. –Davey2010Talk 22:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm finding only routine coverage, which is inadequate under the intentionally strict NCORP standard. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. --Devokewater 00:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As per all above. Cuoxo (talk) 16:44, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, No sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 15:39, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.