Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Lee (businessperson)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 00:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Lee (businessperson)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and a search for supporting sources turns up empty (or just PR fluff) Mazurkevin (talk) 03:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 February 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:57, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator has been blocked as a spammer, however I am leaving this nomination open so that it can be evaluated on its merits. MER-C 11:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for businesspeople.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable business person. Fails WP:PROMO and WP:ORGCRIT. SailingInABathTub (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agrees with the above conclusion. Google reports 2000-ish results, and only returns 5 pages of filtered search results (9 if unfiltered). With the low quality and irrelevant search results, the subject is unlikely to be notable. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 12:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can’t find anything that suggests notability. --Devoke water 15:44, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.