User talk:Burgs2016
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! GorillaWarfare (talk) 14:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Proud Boys. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Talk:Proud Boys. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I don't attack. I point out facts. The fact is that the article I'm referring to is written poorly and misuses a secondary source. You should be more upset about that. Also, if I'm block for pointing out purposely misused secondary sources, you'll just prove my point.
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Talk:Proud Boys, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 16:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Stop treating other editors as opponents to be overcome or denigrated. Bring sources, not accusations. Acroterion (talk) 16:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attacks by a SPA at Talk:Proud Boys. Thank you. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Burgs2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Where was the personal insult? Why is pointing out poor writing and misuse of secondary sources a personal attack. I pointed out ways to fix the problem. This is a serious problem, because it misrepresents the topic. The opposition to me has been nothing but disrespectful and ignorant, and the fact that you even blocked me shows that you support such biased writing. You guys deserve disrespect, but I didn't give any. Point out the person insult. Trust me, I'm using this with my audience. Commenting on the poor writing and misuse of secondary sources is talking about the content. You need to block the others who used personal attacks against me and got off topic by talking about Wikipedia standards, which this has nothing to do with those standards. [[User:Burgs2016|Burgs2016]] ([[User talk:Burgs2016#top|talk]]) 17:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Where was the personal insult? Why is pointing out poor writing and misuse of secondary sources a personal attack. I pointed out ways to fix the problem. This is a serious problem, because it misrepresents the topic. The opposition to me has been nothing but disrespectful and ignorant, and the fact that you even blocked me shows that you support such biased writing. You guys deserve disrespect, but I didn't give any. Point out the person insult. Trust me, I'm using this with my audience. Commenting on the poor writing and misuse of secondary sources is talking about the content. You need to block the others who used personal attacks against me and got off topic by talking about Wikipedia standards, which this has nothing to do with those standards. [[User:Burgs2016|Burgs2016]] ([[User talk:Burgs2016#top|talk]]) 17:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Where was the personal insult? Why is pointing out poor writing and misuse of secondary sources a personal attack. I pointed out ways to fix the problem. This is a serious problem, because it misrepresents the topic. The opposition to me has been nothing but disrespectful and ignorant, and the fact that you even blocked me shows that you support such biased writing. You guys deserve disrespect, but I didn't give any. Point out the person insult. Trust me, I'm using this with my audience. Commenting on the poor writing and misuse of secondary sources is talking about the content. You need to block the others who used personal attacks against me and got off topic by talking about Wikipedia standards, which this has nothing to do with those standards. [[User:Burgs2016|Burgs2016]] ([[User talk:Burgs2016#top|talk]]) 17:39, 16 March 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
There is no person attack. It's an attempt to silence an opposing voice. If the content is biased, do you really think the editors are going to be neutral? @Acroterion is pointing out poor writing standards and a misuse of a secondary source an attack your book? Quite frankly, you guys are the ones attacking me, not the other way around. If anything, you deserve the disrespect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burgs2016 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Insisting there were no attacks and then saying in the next breath that "you deserve the disrespect" and "Wikipedia is an echo chamber of left wing fascism" is an interesting approach. Please remember to sign your posts, even on your own talk page.
- For admins reviewing the unblock request, I believe Acroterion's block was independent of the ANI report, but I did outline the behavior there: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Personal attacks by a SPA at Talk:Proud Boys. GorillaWarfare (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
There were no attacks even though the people on that page deserved them for the disrespect they gave me. See, this is a perfect example of how the culture at Wikipedia uses bias in their writing. I came here as a serious independent who wanted to talk about how the reporting on this article is misleading. All I got in response was attacks after attacks. It's clear to me that this is a left wing group. I'm pissed, so pardon me if I go ahead and do what you accused me of doing when I didn't. All you have done is proven to me that I shouldn't be independent. Burgs2016 (talk) 18:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The real issue here is that any criticism of your work is considered a personal attack. You are just wrong, and I see that others have pointed it out. The writing of this article is biased and false. Even if it wasn't, try counter my actual point instead of referring to Wikipedia standards. Nothing I said about how the article could be reworded goes against the Wikipedia standards. If anything, I was trying to help the article be more neutral so that right wingers can't point to the obvious false statements. But all you have done here is proven to me that you deserve the criticism.
Important notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 GorillaWarfare (talk) 14:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Acroterion (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)- You may not use talkpages as platforms for attacks on other editors who are citing Wikipedia policy that you wish was otherwise. If this conduct recurs, the next block will be indefinite Acroterion (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Good to know that Wikipedia is an echo chamber of left wing fascism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burgs2016 (talk • contribs) 17:45, 16 March 2021 (UTC)