User talk:Sladen

Use this link to leave me a new message.

If you ask a question here, I will reply here. If I start a new thread on your User_talk: page, I will watch the page and reply there.

Archives

Edits

Concern regarding Draft:Jack Rickard (engineer)

Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jack Rickard (engineer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 06:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lego Quatro

Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lego Quatro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 07:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tesla battery cells

Hello, Sladen. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tesla battery cells, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get the P6 microcode keys?

That's Peter's patchtools_pub. That should be in the article. Also we now have that 0x0F 0x0E instruction, it is should be also added with the link to wikipedia's x86 instruction listings. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The, P6/PII/PIII-era keys are now deducible—but that would probably fall under Original Research without a third-party paper to cite;… Ditto for the uarch/Atom instructions in 3DNow! opcode space: needs something published to cite. —Sladen (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is something at least for 3DNOW, not RS, but very detailed: https://blog.can.ac/2021/03/22/speculating-x86-64-isa-with-one-weird-trick/ As for keys, no need for RS. Code itself is generally recognized as RS, even in politics part of Wikipedia. And here we even have a parser of the RC4 decrypted microcode (descramble AND disassembler, p6tools). We also have first bytes of those 4 byte keys (that is 0x30 0x3A 0x3B 0x17 0x33 0x2E, for 6 keys), which means they should be crackable very fast. The ucode blobs are also available... You can just #define those https://github.com/peterbjornx/patchtools_pub/blob/04bf44e6a3c6f9856c410d6b1f90bbbdba604acf/cpukeys.c#L10 and it will be enough to validate. 109.252.90.66 (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]