User talk:Sladen/Archives/2022

Nomination of AdvanceCOMP for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AdvanceCOMP, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdvanceCOMP until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AdvanceCOMP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encoder.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trams in Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schöneweide.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Fifteen Year Society

Would you want an invitation to join the above? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

@Jackiespeel:, been pondering how to reply to this… (Thank You); it is an interesting reminder. Less about a badge and more an observation of time (and life) passing—Wikipedia and along with OpenStreetMap one of the few electronic databases that will likely survive long-term. I guess I should accept ;-) —Sladen (talk) 07:28, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

We joined WP under our names fairly close together. So what do I do with [1] - it is not clear.

There is also a 20 year society. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Arnold van den Bergh (notary)

Hello, Sladen,

Thank you for creating Arnold van den Bergh (notary).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please see the thread which I have opened on the article's talk page. Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Strikerforce}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Strikerforce^Talk 17:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Strikerforce: usually it makes sense to develop new articles via Draft: space (often taking months to work up an article). In this specific case, it seemed sensible to skip over Draft: space—on the basis of the strength of the 1950 newspaper material—and the existence of articles in other languages. I'm happy to be corrected should that judgement call prove incorrect. (The individual would appear to be notable across a timespan of 80+ years.) —Sladen (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Sladen: I see the argument, although not fully sure that I agree with it. I'm still a bit uncomfortable with the fact that we're using someone's speculative involvement with a famous event as a basis for their own article. I'll reiterate here what I said on the article's TP, I'd lean toward including the information within the Anne Frank article, for now. But, I'm open to further discussion. Strikerforce^Talk 20:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Strikerforce: I'm slightly unclear how facilitating the Jacques Goudstikker / Alois Miedl / Hermann Göring art stuff (returned via the 2006 Goudstikker restitution of 202 paintings) would fit on the Anne Frank article. …But I'm open to further suggestions. —Sladen (talk) 22:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@Sladen: With the new information, I'm willing to concede notability and, as such, have removed the tag on the article. Strikerforce^Talk 16:36, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Arnold van den Bergh (notary) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arnold van den Bergh (notary) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold van den Bergh (notary) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Coretheapple (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hogeweyk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hogeweyk, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://trek.zone/en/netherlands/places/631750/hogewey-weesp. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Praxidicae: please you help clarify what is trying to be achieved; perhaps myself or another can help? —The Hogeweyk article is ten years old; so any copyvios are likely to be from the Wikipedia article. (Though I have now reverted a bunch of spammy edits/removal of citations from the last few weeks). —Sladen (talk) 15:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC) (nb. the claimed copyvio page even states "Source: Wikipedia")

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of German rail accidents

added a link pointing to Tagesschau

List of rail accidents (2020–present)

added a link pointing to Tagesschau

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arnold van den Bergh (entrepreneur)

Hello, Sladen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnold van den Bergh (entrepreneur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arnold van den Bergh (entrepreneur)

Hello, Sladen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnold van den Bergh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Adrian Shooter

On 15 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Adrian Shooter, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:02, 15 December 2022 (UTC)