Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar Rashid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No suitable list to redirect to at this time. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Rashid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable cricketer, fails WP:GNG.

Note: The Telegraph article is about his brother Adil Rashid. Störm (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Unicorns (cricket team) 9 List-A matches, but all for the recreational Unicorns side. There looks to be some coverage in match reports and other bits in relation to his brother, but I'm not sure there's anything significant there. Redirect a suitable WP:ATD, but would be nice for List of Unicorns List A players to be set up at some point. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage that makes him a notable cricketer Rondolinda (talk) 22:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Non notable player. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 01:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.