Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/13 Japanese Birds (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Masami Akita discography#As Merzbow. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 13 Japanese Birds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Poorly sourced and I could find no notable, independent sources. Almost all of the references are to reviews on Allmusic or Musique Machine and to the label's site. The article was previously nominated and deleted, and notability was discussed on talk page in 2011. Since then there has been no improvement in references. Pmepepnoute (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Pmepepnoute (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to Masami Akita discography#As Merzbow. This is a common solution for several album AfDs we've seen recently for this preposterously prolific musician. (363 studio albums, including 9 so far this year!). For this particular article, the focus is on the 15-album series, and some of the included albums got reliable reviews and could possibly stand as singular album articles, but the series as a whole did not receive reliable and significant coverage in its own right. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.