Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWHQ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per User:Superastig. Missvain (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DWHQ

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:24, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Hypersonic Broadcasting Center#FM stations; WP:CHEAP Nate • (chatter) 22:16, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The station is licensed per last year's NTC listing as it indicates an operator having a station. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:BCAST. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:BCAST per Astig's argument. SBKSPP (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Astig. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 17:18, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Superastig.--Tdl1060 (talk) 19:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.