Jump to content

User:The ed17/Archives/53

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 12:43, 13 June 2021 (Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Re:WikiWomenCamp

[edit]

I think it's almost there, just waiting on some more feedback from participants. I've contacted Siska (president, Wikimedia Indonesia), Beria (one of the coordinators), and Jaluj (who took one of the pictures used). — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:20, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:Discussion report

[edit]
Hello, The ed17. You have new messages at J36miles's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This Month in GLAM: May 2012

[edit]




Headlines
  • USA report: OCLC announces Wikipedian in Residence; 2 edit-a-thons; US cultural partnerships report; brief news
  • UK report: Monmouthpedia launches; British Library Wikipedian in Residence
  • Spain report: Wikipedian in Residence at National Art Museum; Wikimedia representation at MuseumNext
  • France report: Cultural lobbying; current and future projects
  • Italy report: Wiki Loves Monuments and Case Studies
  • Germany report: GLAM work in cities across Germany
  • Sweden report: GLAM handbook released; Europeana Awareness project launched
  • Mexico report: Collaborating with local artisans through Museo de Arte Popular
  • Africa report: Lagos Black Heritage Festival and Case Studies
  • Australia and New Zealand report: Wikimedia representation at Intelligent Info conference; editing workshops
  • Open Access report: Open Access developments: politics and software
  • Calendar: June's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 21:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for !voting

[edit]
at my successful RFA
Thank you, The ed17/Archives, for !voting at my successful RFA; I am humbled that you put your trust in me. I grant you this flower, which, if tended to properly, will grow to be the fruit of Wikipedia's labours. Thanks for being a great editor (in more than one definition!) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE May drive wrap-up

[edit]
Guild of Copy Editors May 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up

Participation: Out of 54 people who signed up this drive, 32 copy-edited at least one article. Last drive's superstar, Lfstevens, again stood out, topping the leader board in all three categories and copy-editing over 700 articles. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We were once again successful in our primary goal—removing the oldest three months from the backlog—while removing 1166 articles from the queue, the second-most in our history. The total backlog currently sits at around 2600 articles, down from 8323 when we started out just over two years ago.

Coodinator election: The six-month term for our third tranche of Guild coordinators will be expiring at the end of June. We will be accepting nominations for the fourth tranche of coordinators, who will also serve a six-month term. Nominations will open starting on June 5. For complete information, please have a look at the election page. – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, and Stfg

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Q about a comment of yours

[edit]

Hi. Please see User talk:Parsecboy#Herwig, where you'll find a question about an edit and comment you made 2 and a half years ago ;) Scroll up a tad for context. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Carrier Strike Group Twelve

[edit]

Hope all is well, Ed17. Could you do a quick assessment-review of Carrier Strike Group Twelve? Thanks! Marcd30319 (talk) 23:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, Ed17! Marcd30319 (talk) 19:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Anytime. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

[edit]

NPA via IP

[edit]

I'm about to head off for dinner and I'm having connection issues too, but could you check into this gem aimed at me? Thanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:26, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Warned, lemme know if it continues. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:13, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. :) I was about to say that he didn't take the hint, but then I saw this. So I went ahead and hammertimed. - The Bushranger One ping only 15:49, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
"Egrerious"? Props on your diction. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 17:01, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I try to keep my language supercalifragilisticexpialidocious! - The Bushranger One ping only 17:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Destroyer Squadron 7

[edit]

Hope all is well, Ed17, and grad school is tolerable. Could you do a quick assessment-review of Destroyer Squadron 7? Thanks! Marcd30319 (talk) 22:00, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

No grad school yet – one more semester of undergrad! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:35, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Nematode

[edit]

Here ya go: [1] Kaldari (talk) 03:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, adding it now. Oop, I see you already have. Thanks! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

[edit]

Still need reviews for the Wikipedia Education Program research project

[edit]

Hey, Ed! If you have some time to review the quality of some articles, we're using the results for a really important research project that will help shape the future of the US/Canada Education Program. For a few projects, we're on a pretty tight timeline and are really eager to have many more of these articles reviewed over the next week. However, we think it's most useful to come from experienced Wikipedia editors.

I have gone through each class to prioritize for various projects, and everyone on the Education team at the Wikimedia Foundation would be extremely grateful if you could participate by reviewing a few articles ('pre' and 'post' versions). If we can rally a lot of editors to review one or two articles each day, we will be able to make the most use of this research for our tight timeline. As many of our Ambassadors have requested it, we are really eager to find out which classes have been successful according to the Wikipedian standard.

If you can spare some time, please check out these priority articles and give it a go. Even 1 or 2 a day would help immensely! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 02:15, 15 June 2012 (UTC)