Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siamak Baharloo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siamak Baharloo[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Looks like most of the sources are puff pieces and press releases, as well as some primary sources. I just speedy deleted Labviva, the subject's company, which has been repeatedly created by the author of this article. Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't meet GNG. While some of his early academic work is well cited, his h-index is below 10 and he doesn't tick off any of the NPROF criteria.--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks notability, no reliable sources found for the information mentioned.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 04:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 11:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.