Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Narahalli Balasubramanya
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 04:53, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Narahalli Balasubramanya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. Do not pass general notability criteria WP:GNG. And hence failed WP:NACADEMIC. Draft declined multiple times by Theroadislong, Bonadea, Dan arndt and Kylietastic. DMySon 02:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. DMySon 02:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon 02:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete If an article was declined through AfC, we should not have it. I really think we should make all new articles go through AfC.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.