Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salud Beverages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Salud Beverages

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo piece about a non-notable ROTM business. Single source cited only once, and a search finds nothing beyond social media accounts, business/directory listings, and some press release regurgitations. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. Previously speedied and subsequently quickly recreated, hence this AfD. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:42, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although it should be noted that the article has has sources added since being nominated, none of these are reliable or independent of the subject: This even states that it was written by the company's founder, this does not seem to be independent of the subject either or neutral (I mean, what do you make of this: "Salud promises us a new beginning, a fresh life, with a 2.0 update! And given the year we’ve had, maybe a little G&T is exactly what we need!"), and this is almost from a reliable source, but just an "interview" with the founder Ajay Shetty. I myself found a very short text that mentions the company here, speaking about an investment. But it's not a full length article and not enough to establish notability by a long shot. Thus, delete. --LordPeterII (talk) 22:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eternal Shadow Talk 16:50, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article is a PR exercise, with sources that, while they have improved, all also look like PR activity Dexxtrall (talk) 21:37, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Written like a PR release.--Bettydaisies (talk) 01:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.