Jump to content

User talk:Anticvobs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anticvobs (talk | contribs) at 07:43, 27 July 2021. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

April 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Pupsterlove02. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Malaria, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 14:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pupsterlove02 I re-add it together with with independent scientific source. Anticvobs (talk) 15:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jack Casey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Paulius Stankevicius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

0 incoming links. Born 1992. I guess that fails WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Edward Yardeni (Businessman), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Gerard (talk) 06:41, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Information icon

Hello Anticvobs. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anticvobs. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anticvobs|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Template:Z159 David Gerard (talk) 06:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, good morning. I have went for vacation. I just noticed that you have talked to me on my talk page asking me whether I involve in UPE and I haven't disclose it. I followed wikipedia policy and I read most of it rules. I don't involve in paid edition as I know it's highly prohibited here in wikipedia. So also, I have no personal connection to pages I created. Though, I can see most of the articles that I wrote have been nominated for deletion. It's fine if they are not notable. Anticvobs (talk) 07:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kurt Newman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article. One third-party cite, to an interview in a trade magazine. WP:BEFORE shows passing mentions and self-sourced material, not the third party independent coverage need to have a WP:BLP here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 06:44, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adamu Garba II moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 07:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]