If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sasquatcht|c 18:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, I have carefully reviewed your edits and it appears you are doing the what Girth Summit warned you about not doing. By no means am I saying Lugnuts acted perfectly, but the unblock was conditioned on the premise that you understood what you were being told but it does not appear you entirely do. After looking at the interaction timelines and your past behavior, it appears you are primarily the one being disruptive here. Sasquatcht|c 18:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sasquatch, This time I had not harassed any editor or made any personal attacks. I was not really stalking. But yes the interaction may give the impression that I was stalking. From the next time, I will be careful if Lugnuts has edited any page recently or not. I will be more careful from the next time. Please give me a last chance. From the next time I will not make such a edit that gives the impression of stalking. Please give me the last chance. thanks — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 02:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I am also a human. Lugnuts just provided a few diffs and those few diffs just makes you believe that I am stalking. So, it was also difficult me to ensure that I would be accused of stalking if edited those pages. But next time I will be more careful. In this one week just my few edits are overlaps. From the next time I will also try to avoid overlaps. And this time I also hadn't made any personal attacks. So, please unblock me. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 02:18, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to oppose some of the diffs. I edited here because the player recently appeared in the one-off Test match against Bangladesh. He made his debut in the match and scored 87 runs, which was the highest score by a Zimbabwean opener on Test debut, but it wasn't mentioned in the article. So, I included something more as it was a significant record. And here I edited because Mahmudullah recently announced his retirement from Test cricket. So, anyone can edit it to correct a mistake it doesn't mean that I was stalking. And before Lugnuts edited the page Shadman Islam, I had edited the page. As I have told earlier, I save page into watchlist after editing, so I got notified when Lugnuts had edited the page. I completely oppose this edit. Anuradha Doddaballapur got his call-up for the recently concluded series France women's cricket team in Germany in 2021. And she was the highest wicket-taker and the player of the series. But, it wasn't described in the article, so I edited that article. I didn't even know that this article was recently edited by Lugnuts.
Apart from this, WP:HOUNDING clearly states, This is with an apparent aim of creating irritation, annoyance, or distress to the other editor. Hounding usually involves following the target from place to place on Wikipedia. But I haven't caused them any annoyance or distress, so how can it be harassment? Ok, I will also stop saving pages into watchlist for 1 week, as there is accusations on stalking. I will notice if it was recently edited by Lugnuts or not. It is obvious that I was really not stalking after being unblocked. But this time I will try my best to avoid those acts which gives the impression of stalking. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 02:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Re, your email, I have no intention on unblocking based on what I saw in your interactions after you were unblocked. Sasquatcht|c 20:32, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sasquatch: Have you even read my full message before giving this absurd reply. I would like to remind again- This is not like that I have shown a sudden interest in editing the given pages after Lugnuts edited those. I have been making such types of edits for a long time. Let me show some related edits without any close interactions with Lugnuts in the recent past. See Special:Diff/1032869756, here also I have edited the page after the player had scored a century based on the recent match report. Other examples include- See this diff, this, this, this, this, this, this and this diff. All these edits were about updating players' recent match performance (such as scored a century or took 5 wickets) or call-ups to the national team in different tournaments. And the pages had not been edited by Lugnuts (recently) before I edited. So, you have to believe that I have been making these type of edits for a long time. Thus, how can it be hounding? I have not followed their edits around and found pages to edit, rather I was always making these types of edits.
And regarding retirements or coaching, I have also always been updating BLP articles, who have been appointed as the coach of the team or have announced retirement, as you can see the full list here and here.
Also, you are still ignoring the fact that you are a bit WP:INVOLVED. Why are you not willing to discuss the matter. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 05:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sasquatch: Why aren't you replying? As I have told earlier, I have always been editing these type of articles. Unblock me, and open a discussion on the appropriate noticeboard involving cricket members. I am confident in that case, but I am not going to comply with your own personal thoughts. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 09:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How am I involved? Either way, I have made my position clear. Please follow the instructions on the block template to request an unblock. Sasquatcht|c 19:46, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sasquatch: You have said that you made your position clear, while the opposite one is also correct- You have not made your position clear. You told earlier that you had had nothing to do about this from your perspective. While, suddenly you changed your mind and started to believe in Lugnuts' words along with being confused. The diffs that Lugnuts linked here, were all edited by me independently, as I have already told you above and via email. However, you always seem to ignore those. I have obviously not used Lugnuts' contributions to edit pages. I actually fail to adhere to if you really understand what WP:HOUND is. This needs third opinion or consensus, which you are not willing to seek. — A.A Prinon Leave a dialogue 06:26, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In response to my 4000 active edits, I didn't expect such kind of treatment towards me. In other words, this is exactly not a way to treat a user who has volunteered hundreds of hours of their life in making useful and positive contributions.
.gif){kind=small}
