Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deja Vu (Sonamoo EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sonamoo. Sandstein 12:31, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deja Vu (Sonamoo EP)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sonamoo's EP, Deja Vu, should be deleted due to no sources. I don't see any sources. A2013a (talk) 19:43, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Aranya (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:28, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Remember to do WP:BEFORE. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 01:45, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Man, Asians are facing a lotta shit: Model minority stereotypes, racist stereotypes in entertainment, un-warranted phobias that they may be spreading a deadly virus, and Kpop groups getting number one on the Goan chart and never be reviewed by HQ reliable sources. I don't know the reliability of any of these sources, so if someone can confirm Seoulbeats, Kultscene, Allkpop, and Kpop Starz are reliable sources, I will vote Keep. Otherwise, merge to artist article. 👨x🐱 (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
HumanxAnthro, see WP:KO/RS#UR. The general consensus is that all of these are unreliable being either gossip sites or fan blogs, and are generally avoided in Korean music articles. Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Welp, merge to artist article, then. The album was number-one on the Goan chart, but that alone isn't enough to make the article longer than stub-length. Every kpop act usually has works that only appear on the Korean charts, with the exception of BTS of course, and peak positions can just easily be listed in a discography article or section. Also, awesome username, Ashley. 👨x🐱 (talk) 20:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 10:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Sonamoo. Unfortunately does not appear to have enough coverage to warrant a standalone article, despite meeting WP:NALBUM which says Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discography. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:57, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Sonamoo per above. Zackdasnicker (talk) 09:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sonamoo#Discography. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. Nothing worth merging since its chart info is already in the discography. SBKSPP (talk) 03:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this charted at #1? I think it's likely there are more sources that exist, just not in English. This is kinda the point of SNGs and reasonably-so in this case. Elli (talk | contribs) 05:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.