User talk:Kiwisleep

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Peter9753 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter9753. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TheresNoTime ^😺 13:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kiwisleep (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is justified simply by the claim that Peter9753 voted to support my request. But so did Roman Spinner and Necrothesp! And someone, I don't know who that is, actually made the change. In fact, Peter9753 was making a different argument than mine, he is proposing a dual identifier. If anyone is making the same argument as me it is Necrothesp. I suggested this person is mainly now known as a historian. I got reported by a contributor who seems to only contribute to pages with athletic content (Joseph2302; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joseph2302) and who had a rather unsupported case (that a major historian be only identified by an athletic activity he had decades ago but which alone interests him). His preference did not prevail and reported me simply because someone backed my position--with a different request! I would really appreciate my account being unblocked, because I do want to continue contributing on pages and build a profile and to be able to offer more and I don't want to create a new account. Thank you. Kiwisleep (talk) 02:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The block is justified simply by the claim that Peter9753 voted to support my request. But so did Roman Spinner and Necrothesp!  And someone, I don't know who that is, actually made the change. In fact, Peter9753 was making a different argument than mine, he is proposing a dual identifier. If anyone is making the same argument as me it is Necrothesp. I suggested this person is mainly now known as a historian. I got reported by a contributor who seems to only contribute to pages with athletic content (Joseph2302; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joseph2302) and who had a rather unsupported case (that a major historian be only identified by an athletic activity he had decades ago but which alone interests him). His preference did not prevail and reported me simply because someone backed my position--with a different request! I would really appreciate my account being unblocked, because I do want to continue contributing on pages and build a profile and to be able to offer more and I don't want to create a new account. Thank you. [[User:Kiwisleep|Kiwisleep]] ([[User talk:Kiwisleep#top|talk]]) 02:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block is justified simply by the claim that Peter9753 voted to support my request. But so did Roman Spinner and Necrothesp!  And someone, I don't know who that is, actually made the change. In fact, Peter9753 was making a different argument than mine, he is proposing a dual identifier. If anyone is making the same argument as me it is Necrothesp. I suggested this person is mainly now known as a historian. I got reported by a contributor who seems to only contribute to pages with athletic content (Joseph2302; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joseph2302) and who had a rather unsupported case (that a major historian be only identified by an athletic activity he had decades ago but which alone interests him). His preference did not prevail and reported me simply because someone backed my position--with a different request! I would really appreciate my account being unblocked, because I do want to continue contributing on pages and build a profile and to be able to offer more and I don't want to create a new account. Thank you. [[User:Kiwisleep|Kiwisleep]] ([[User talk:Kiwisleep#top|talk]]) 02:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The block is justified simply by the claim that Peter9753 voted to support my request. But so did Roman Spinner and Necrothesp!  And someone, I don't know who that is, actually made the change. In fact, Peter9753 was making a different argument than mine, he is proposing a dual identifier. If anyone is making the same argument as me it is Necrothesp. I suggested this person is mainly now known as a historian. I got reported by a contributor who seems to only contribute to pages with athletic content (Joseph2302; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Joseph2302) and who had a rather unsupported case (that a major historian be only identified by an athletic activity he had decades ago but which alone interests him). His preference did not prevail and reported me simply because someone backed my position--with a different request! I would really appreciate my account being unblocked, because I do want to continue contributing on pages and build a profile and to be able to offer more and I don't want to create a new account. Thank you. [[User:Kiwisleep|Kiwisleep]] ([[User talk:Kiwisleep#top|talk]]) 02:23, 8 August 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}