User talk:Waalkes
May 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sword bayonet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- (In truth, most riflemen found it worked better for cutting brush and roasting meat over a fire. (''
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:10, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Schiller Institute may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Yalta]] treaties, which have tossed us from one catastrophe to another for an entire century. (''Wir brauchen eine Bewegung, die Deutschland endlich aus der Kontrolle der Kräfte von Versailles
- {{quote|The antisemitism at a meeting of the Schiller Institute would not be obvious at first. You
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Chip Bertlet
[edit]What is the purpose for your changes? Removing investigative and photo journalist?Serialjoepsycho (talk) 02:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Schiller Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cathedral of the Holy Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
I've opened a request for mediation. I think it could help having an impartial mediator. Please cosnider going there and signing up.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 22:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Formal mediation has been requested
[edit]The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Schiller Institute". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 31 May 2014.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 22:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Request for mediation accepted
[edit]The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Schiller Institute, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Schiller Institute, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee, Sunray (talk) 04:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
MedCom case update: Schiller Institute
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/MedCom_laurel.png/50px-MedCom_laurel.png)
Dear Waalkes: Hello. I'm writing to you regarding a Mediation Committee case that you are involved in, or have some connection with, Schiller Institute.
My name is Tristessa de St Ange (talk · contribs), and I'll be your mediator for this case. It's good to meet you! I'm currently in the process of researching the content issue regarding this article (and the wider dispute) in some detail, and I hope I'll be able to assist in bringing some consensus to this editing dispute. I would like to ask all parties to bear with me while I complete this research, and am extremely grateful for your patience whilst I get things underway. I will let you know as soon as things are underway.
If you have any questions or concerns relating to the case, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Tristessa (talk) 21:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
MedCom case update: Schiller Institute
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6d/MedCom_laurel.png/50px-MedCom_laurel.png)
Dear Waalkes: Hello. I'm writing to you regarding a Mediation Committee case that you are involved in, or have some connection with, Schiller Institute.
I have written an initial analysis, and requested contribution from all mediation parties. Please read what I've written and participate at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Schiller Institute. Thank you.
If you have any questions or concerns relating to the case, please do let me know. Thank you very much. Tristessa (talk) 00:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)